henhaobio
Sign in

Scientific ReportsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

The interplay of uncertainty, relevance and learning influences auditory categorization

Janaki K. ShethiD, Jared S. CollinaiD, Eugenio PiasiniiD, Konrad Paul KordingiD, Yale E. CoheniD, Maria Neimark GeffeniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Auditory perception requires categorizing sound sequences, such as speech or music, into classes, such as syllables or notes. Auditory categorization depends not only on the acoustic waveform, but also on variability and uncertainty in how the listener perceives the sound - including sensory and stimulus uncertainty, the listeners estimated relevance of the particular sound to the task, and their ability to learn the past statistics of the acoustic environment. Whereas these factors have been studied in isolation, whether and how these factors interact to shape categorization remains unknown. Here, we measured human participants performance on a multi-tone categorization task and modeled each participants behavior using a Bayesian framework. Task-relevant tones contributed more to category choice than task-irrelevant tones, confirming that participants combined information about sensory features with task relevance. Conversely, participants poor estimates of task-relevant tones or high-sensory uncertainty adversely impacted category choice. Learning the statistics of sound category over both short and long timescales also affected decisions, biasing the decisions toward the overrepresented category. The magnitude of this effect correlated inversely with participants relevance estimates. Our results demonstrate that individual participants idiosyncratically weigh sensory uncertainty, task relevance, and statistics over both short and long timescales, providing a novel understanding of and a computational framework for how sensory decisions are made under several simultaneous behavioral demands.

Citations
1
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
1th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISDenison '18Hong '24West '23Collina '25Bruckner '20Beierholm '20
78% semantic matchNeuroscience
Rachel N. Denison, William T. Adler, Marisa Carrasco+1 more·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences·Oct 8, 2018· 122 citations