henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint

CROWN: Curated Repository Of Well-resolved Noncovalent interactions

Robin PoelmansiD, Wout Van EyndeiD, Bence BruncsicsiD, Bruncsics Balint, Ádám AranyiD, Yves MoreauiD, Arnout R. D. VoetiD

PDFDOICodeData

In-depth summary

Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 8 Nov 2026 · from the full text of version 2 (2 Sept 2026) · CC BY 4.0

An automated pipeline turns the PDB into 178,263 repaired, protonated, restraint-minimized protein-ligand complexes; scoring functions trained on them beat HiQBind-trained ones on CASF-2016 ranking and docking power.

Curated protein-ligand sets (PDBBind, HiQBind) cover a narrow slice of the PDB, while PLINDER is broad but applies minimal quality filtering and leaves artifacts uncorrected. CROWN applies automated filtering, repair, protonation and restrained energy minimization across the PDB.

Key results

  1. ShownCROWN is much broader in protein and ligand diversity than the curated alternatives PDBBind and HiQBind.

    178,263 entries from 76,446 PDB IDs and 18,124 UniProt accessions, vs 3,627 (PDBBind) and 2,705 (HiQBind) UniProt IDs; 31,005 CCD identifiers and 18,317 Murcko scaffolds. · Dataset Scope and Diversity; Tables

  2. ShownThe final dataset has no unresolved ligand atoms, missing bonds, steric clashes or non-standard pocket residues, unlike PDBBind and PLINDER.

    CROWN: zero entries with each defect. PDBBind: 463 unresolved ligand atoms, 990 missing bonds, 323 steric overlaps. PLINDER: more than 18,000, over 37,000 and over 5,600 respectively. · Structure Quality and Annotation Completeness; Tables

  3. ShownFlat-bottom-restrained minimization lowers PoseBusters failure rates while keeping the binding geometry close to the crystal coordinates.

    Protein-ligand clashes fall from 12.97% to 5.23%, water clashes from 5.83% to 0.89%, internal clashes from 0.85% to 0.17%. Median RMSD vs crystal: about 0.22 Å (pocket), 0.27 Å (ligand). · Constrained energy minimization

  4. SuggestedTwo knowledge-based scoring functions trained on CROWN outperform HiQBind-trained versions on CASF-2016, most clearly in ranking and docking power.

    Mean ranking Spearman 0.509 to 0.637 (DESPOT) and 0.235 to 0.374 (DESPOT-screen); Pearson scoring 0.536 to 0.606 and 0.404 to 0.452. Top-1 docking success 0.789 vs 0.719, reported in the DESPOT-screen context (the abstract gives 0.785 vs 0.724 without naming the model). · Abstract; CROWN as a training resource; CASF-2016 benchmark

  5. ShownThe pipeline keeps most PDB candidates, though structure repair is the largest loss, and it provides three-axis cluster labels for leakage-controlled splits.

    From 201,124 structures and 258,241 candidate complexes: 22.48% fail repair, 89.51% of the rest pass QC, 99.48% of those minimize. 80% of data sits in 22.9% of protein clusters and 13.3% of ligand clusters. · Pipeline Development: From Manual Curation to…; Multi-axis clustering for leakage-controlled…

Methods, data and reproducibility

Five stages on PDB mmCIF files: curation, ligand and pocket definition, PDBFixer repair, geometric interaction quality control (density-fit metrics RSR/RSCC/Q-score reported but not used to exclude complexes), then protonation at pH 7.4 and OpenMM minimization with flat-bottomed pocket restraints. Two scoring functions were trained on CROWN, raw CROWN (CROWN-xtal) or HiQBind and tested on CASF-2016.

  • PDB X-ray and cryo-EM structures with resolution better than 3 Å (pipeline input) · n = 201,124 structures; 258,241 candidate complexes; 178,263 final complexes
  • CASF-2016 benchmark (scoring, ranking, docking, screening power) · n = 285 complexes in 57 protein clusters
  • HiQBind, used as the comparison training set
Methods & tools
Gemmi, PDBFixer, OpenMM 8.4.0, AMBER ff19SB, OpenFF 2.2.0, Dimorphite-DL, FreeSASA, MMseqs2, RDKit, DESPOT, PoseBusters, CASF-2016
Software & environment
OpenMM 8.4.0; the repository is said to hold full version information and environment specifications. Pipeline released under the MIT license, dataset under CC-BY 4.0.
Assay conditions & compute
Linux workstation with AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX (64 cores, 128 threads) and 252 GB RAM; about one week wall-clock for the full dataset.
Reproducibility gaps
The authors note that the pipeline was designed through iterative manual testing and rule refinement, so extending it to new structure types will need comparable effort.
Limitations (5)
  • OpenFF 2.2.0 lacks metal-coordination bonds and rare elements such as boron, selenium and silicon. Only heme, MGD and the [4Fe-4S] cluster are handled via an AMBER-derived workaround; other systems with metallo-organic residues are not retained, so metalloprotein-ligand diversity is not covered. · stated by the authors
  • Non-standard amino acids within the binding pocket cannot be parameterized, so those entries were removed; outside the pocket they are replaced by standard residues. · stated by the authors
  • Extending CROWN to NMR structures or to covalent inhibitors and metallodrugs will likely need a comparably intensive effort. · stated by the authors
  • The downstream test uses only the authors' own DESPOT scoring functions (described in a companion manuscript) and one comparison set, HiQBind. The abstract's top-1 docking figures (0.785 vs 0.724) are not attributed to a model and do not match the DESPOT-screen values in the results (0.789 vs 0.719). · noted in this summary
  • On CASF-2016 the energy-minimized and raw CROWN variants differ only slightly, so the benchmark does not show the benefit of the minimization step itself. · noted in this summary

Read this if you train or benchmark structure-based models on protein-ligand complexes and want a large, uniformly cleaned, label-free PDB-derived dataset with cluster labels for leakage-controlled splits.

Citations
1

Abstract

The development of machine-learning models for protein-ligand interactions is constrained by the quality and diversity of the available structural data. Existing resources force researchers into a trade-off: carefully curated collections such as PDBBind and HiQBind offer high structural reliability but cover only a narrow slice of the Protein Data Bank (PDB), whereas large-scale resources such as PLINDER provide broad coverage with minimal quality control. We present CROWN (Curated Repository Of Well-resolved Non-covalent interactions), a machine-learning-ready dataset that reconciles scale and rigor through a fully automated preprocessing pipeline. Starting from the PDB database, CROWN applies a series of interleaved quality filters and processing stages that address crystallographic resolution, ligand identity, pocket completeness, structural repair, interaction quality, and protonation at physiological pH. The pipeline finishes with a constrained energy-minimization step built on custom flat-bottomed restraints - a step absent from all existing protein-ligand datasets - that balances crystallographic evidence against the relaxation of intramolecular strain. By reconciling the heterogeneous refinement practices of different depositions without distorting the experimentally observed binding geometry, this step yields a structurally uniform collection of 178,263 complexes, representing a roughly four-fold increase in protein diversity over PDBBind and HiQBind. Rather than organizing the data around sparsely available, bias-prone binding affinities, CROWN adopts a geometry-centric design philosophy that treats the three-dimensional arrangement of atoms at the binding interface as a self-consistent source of information. To demonstrate its value as a training resource, we trained two knowledge-based scoring functions on CROWN and benchmarked them on CASF-2016: relative to HiQBind-trained counterparts, CROWN-trained models showed markedly improved ranking power (mean Spearman correlation rising from 0.509 to 0.637) and docking power (top-1 near-native pose recovery of 0.785 versus 0.724). Because CROWN imposes no requirement for affinity labels, it can in principle support any model that learns from or is evaluated against protein-ligand complex structures. We anticipate that it will serve as a broadly useful resource for tasks such as the training of binder generation, protein design or protein folding models conditioned on bound ligands, the development of scoring functions or benchmarking of interaction-prediction methods.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.