Sign in
NeuroscienceImaging Neuroscience
Peer-reviewed journal article

Translating phenotypic prediction models from big to small anatomical MRI data using meta-matching

Naren WulaniD, Lijun AniD, Chen ZhangiD, Ru KongiD, Pansheng CheniD, Danilo BzdokiD, Simon Bodo EickhoffiD, Avram J. HolmesiD, B.T. Thomas YeoiD

Abstract

Individualized phenotypic prediction based on structural MRI is an important goal in neuroscience. Prediction performance increases with larger samples, but small-scale datasets with fewer than 200 participants are often unavoidable. We have previously proposed a "meta-matching" framework to translate models trained from large datasets to improve the prediction of new unseen phenotypes in small collection efforts. Meta-matching exploits correlations between phenotypes, yielding large improvement over classical machine learning when applied to prediction models using resting-state functional connectivity as input features. Here, we adapt the two best performing meta-matching variants ("meta-matching finetune" and "meta-matching stacking") from our previous study to work with T1-weighted MRI data by changing the base neural network architecture to a 3D convolution neural network. We compare the two meta-matching variants with elastic net and classical transfer learning using the UK Biobank (N = 36,461), Human Connectome Project Young Adults (HCP-YA) dataset (N = 1,017) and HCP-Aging dataset (N = 656). We find that meta-matching outperforms elastic net and classical transfer learning by a large margin, both when translating models within the same dataset, as well as translating models across datasets with different MRI scanners, acquisition protocols and demographics. For example, when translating a UK Biobank model to 100 HCP-YA participants, meta-matching finetune yielded a 136% improvement in variance explained over transfer learning, with an average absolute gain of 2.6% (minimum = -0.9%, maximum = 17.6%) across 35 phenotypes. Overall, our results highlight the versatility of the meta-matching framework.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
7
FWCI
1.70
Field percentile
top 17%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISChen '23He '22Adkinson '24Schulz '23Chen '26He '19
85% semantic matchNeuroscience
Pansheng Chen, Lijun An, Naren Wulan+11 more·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2023· 1 citations