Comparative microbiome analyses reveal differences between wild populations and captive groups of the Montseny Brook Newt (Calotriton arnoldi)
Sergi A. Tulloch JiméneziD, Maria EstarellasiD, Dean C. AdamsiD, Anthony M BonacoltaiD, Viviana PagoneiD, Daniel Fernández‐GuiberteauiD, Fèlix AmatiD, Albert MontoriiD, Francesc Carbonell, Elena ObóniD, Mónica Pineda Alonso, Marta Santmartín, Josep Xarles, Rosa Marsol, Daniel Guinart, Sonia Mariella Brito SolorzanoiD, Adrián TalaveraiD, Bernat Burriel‐CarranzaiD, Elena BoschiD, Javier del CampoiD, Salvador CarranzaiD
Abstract
The Montseny brook newt, Calotriton arnoldi, is a Critically Endangered amphibian species endemic to the Montseny Massif in Catalonia, Northeastern Spain. Due to population declines and threats to its natural habitat, an ex-situ breeding program was initiated in 2007. A key goal of the program is to ensure the survival of captive-bred individuals after reintroduction, which in amphibians heavily relies on the specimens microbiome being capable of protecting them from environmental microorganisms, especially considering the global Chytridiomycosis pandemic caused by the fungi Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) and Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans (Bsal). This study aims to characterize the microbiome of wild and captive specimens of Calotriton arnoldi, to identify differences in microbiome composition, and to determine their potential impact on captive-bred individuals upon reintroduction. Up to 7,438 ASVs (Amplicon Sequence Variants) were identified from 138 samples from 21 and 61 wild and captive-bred individuals, respectively. Results indicate that wild populations from different subspecies have significantly different microbiome composition, as do wild and captive-bred groups from the same subspecies. Additionally, dissimilarities in microbiome variability were only found within each subspecies, between wild and captive-bred groups. In terms of composition, certain bacteria were identified as potential markers for both wild and captive environments. Enhancing microbiome variability might improve the survival prospects of reintroduced specimens. Thus, exposing captive specimens to a more natural environment while in captivity or a soft-release procedure could potentially mitigate the absence of exposure to other bacteria and potential pathogens from their native environment.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Longitudinal characterization of the captive adult and tadpole Wyoming toad (Anaxyrus baxteri) microbiome
N. Scarberry, Z. L. McAdams, … A. C. Ericsson·bioRxiv·Jun 13, 2023
- Environmental factors and host sex influence the skin microbiome structure of Hong Kong newt (Paramesotriton hongkongensis) in a coldspot of chytridiomycosis in subtropical East Asia
Bowen Wan, Guoling Chen, … Simon Yung Wa Sin·Integrative ZoologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 13, 2024
- Captivity and exposure to the emerging fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans are linked to perturbation and dysbiosis of the amphibian skin microbiome
Kieran A Bates, Jennifer MG Shelton, … Matthew C Fisher·bioRxiv·Jun 7, 2018
- Characterization of a core fungal community and captivity-induced "mycobiome" change in Fowler's Toad (Anaxyrus fowleri)
Alexander James Bradshaw, Sinlan Poo, … Javier F. Tabima·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2025
- Mitigation of chytrid infection on tadpoles with the antimicrobial metabolites of Xenorhabdus szentirmaii
János Ujszegi, Zsófia Boros, … Andrea Kásler·Microbiology SpectrumPeer-reviewed·Aug 4, 2025
- Imminent invasion of the chytrid fungus threatens the last naive amphibian biodiversity hotspots
Amadeus Plewnia, Frank Pasmans, … Stefan Lötters·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2026