Attention Promotes the Neural Encoding of Prediction Errors
Cooper SmoutiD, Matthew F. TangiD, Marta Isabel GarridoiD, Jason B. MattingleyiD
Abstract
The human brain is thought to optimise the encoding of incoming sensory information through two principal mechanisms: prediction uses stored information to guide the interpretation of forthcoming sensory events, and attention prioritizes these events according to their behavioural relevance. Despite the ubiquitous contributions of attention and prediction to various aspects of perception and cognition, it remains unknown how they interact to modulate information processing in the brain. A recent extension of predictive coding theory suggests that attention optimises the expected precision of predictions by modulating the synaptic gain of prediction error units. Since prediction errors code for the difference between predictions and sensory signals, this model would suggest that attention increases the selectivity for mismatch information in the neural response to a surprising stimulus. Alternative predictive coding models proposes that attention increases the activity of prediction (or representation) neurons, and would therefore suggest that attention and prediction synergistically modulate selectivity for feature information in the brain. Here we applied multivariate forward encoding techniques to neural activity recorded via electroencephalography (EEG) as human observers performed a simple visual task, to test for the effect of attention on both mismatch and feature information in the neural response to surprising stimuli. Participants attended or ignored a periodic stream of gratings, the orientations of which could be either predictable, surprising, or unpredictable. We found that surprising stimuli evoked neural responses that were encoded according to the difference between predicted and observed stimulus features, and that attention facilitated the encoding of this type of information in the brain. These findings advance our understanding of how attention and prediction modulate information processing in the brain, and support the theory that attention optimises precision expectations during hierarchical inference by increasing the gain of prediction errors.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 122
- FWCI
- 9.00
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Global Effects of Feature-based Attention Depend on Surprise
Cooper Smout, Marta Isabel Garrido, Jason B. Mattingley·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Apr 8, 2020
- Bayesian mapping reveals that attention boosts neural responses to predicted and unpredicted stimuli
Marta Isabel Garrido, Elise Rowe, … Jason B. Mattingley·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2017
- Predictive learning shapes the representational geometry of the human brain
Antonino Greco, Julia Moser, … Markus Siegel·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2024
- Prediction mismatch responses arise as corrections of a predictive spiking code
Kjartan van Driel, Lucas Rudelt, … Fabian A. Mikulasch·bioRxiv·Nov 16, 2023
- Prediction Error and Repetition Suppression Have Distinct Effects on Neural Representations of Visual Information
Matthew F. Tang, Cooper Smout, … Jason B. Mattingley·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 14, 2018
- Unattended visual stimuli do not produce prediction error responses despite being initially encoded
Alie G. Male, Robert P. O’Shea·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2022