Brain stimulationNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Vestibular involvement in transcranial electrical stimulation: body sway as a marker of unintended stimulation
Abstract
BackgroundTranscranial electrical stimulation (tES) techniques are widely used to modulate brain excitability, though their mechanisms remain unclear. ObjectiveWe aimed to demonstrate that an alternating current applied to several commonly used tES electrode montages can influence the vestibular system. MethodsBody-sway responses during alternating current stimulation at 4.6 or 4.8 Hz were measured in eight participants standing on a force platform. Sham and five active conditions, including common motor cortical tES electrode montages, were applied in a double-blind experiment. ResultsAll active conditions increased lateral body sway compared with sham at the stimulus frequency, with very large to huge effect sizes. The sway magnitude was proportional to the montage-specific electric field within the vestibular system, obtained from a computational model. The frequency and phase of the body sway were locked to the stimulus frequency and phase. An additional experiment in three participants showed that the sway response was the largest in the lower legs, similarly for both tES with a motor cortical electrode montage and an electrical vestibular stimulation montage. Together, the results suggest a direct effect of tES on the vestibular system. ConclusionUnwanted vestibular effects may interfere with the interpretation of tES studies across a wide range of typical tES frequencies and current intensities. HighlightsO_LIAlternating current stimulation produces a lateral body sway at the stimulation frequency. C_LIO_LILarger lateral electric field in the vestibular system produces a larger sway. C_LIO_LISeveral common tES montages can directly influence the vestibular system. C_LIO_LIUnwanted vestibular effects may complicate the interpretation of tES studies. C_LI
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Field percentile
- top 44%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Individual-specific effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses
Aurimas Mockevičius, Xiaojuan Wang, … Inga Griškova-Bulanova·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Mimicking and mitigating the cutaneous response to transcranial electrical stimulation using interferential and combinatorial techniques
B. Howell, C. C. McIntyre·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2021
- Integrating electric field modelling and neuroimaging to explain inter-individual variability of tACS effects
Florian H. Kasten, Katharina Duecker, … Christoph Siegfried Herrmann·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 28, 2019
- Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in human and nonhuman primates
Alexander Opitz, Arnaud Falchier, … Charles Schroeder·bioRxiv·May 18, 2016
- Electric field dynamics in the brain during multi-electrode transcranial electric stimulation
Ivan Alekseichuk, Arnaud Falchier, … Alexander Opitz·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2019
- Blinding efficacy and adverse events following repeated transcranial alternating current, direct current, and random noise stimulation.
James G. Sheffield, Sumientra M. Rampersad, … Roi Cohen Kadosh·CortexPeer-reviewed·Jun 14, 2022