eNeuroNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Neurophysiological evidence for cognitive map formation during sequence learning
Jennifer StisoiD, Christopher W. LynniD, Ari E. KahniD, Vinitha RangarajaniD, Karol P. SzymulaiD, Ryan ArcheriD, Andrew Y. RevelliD, Joel M. SteiniD, Brian LittiD, Kathryn A. DavisiD, Timothy H. Lucas, Dani S. BassettiD
Abstract
Humans deftly parse statistics from sequences. Some theories posit that humans learn these statistics by forming cognitive maps, or underlying representations of the latent space which links items in the sequence. Here, an item in the sequence is a node, and the probability of transitioning between two items is an edge. Sequences can then be generated from walks through the latent space, with different spaces giving rise to different sequence statistics. Individual or group differences in sequence learning can be modeled by changing the time scale over which estimates of transition probabilities are built, or in other words, by changing the amount of temporal discounting. Latent space models with temporal discounting bear a resemblance to models of navigation through Euclidean spaces. However, few explicit links have been made between predictions from Euclidean spatial navigation and neural activity during human sequence learning. Here, we use a combination of behavioral modeling and intracranial encephalography (iEEG) recordings to investigate how neural activity might support the formation of space-like cognitive maps through temporal discounting during sequence learning. Specifically, we acquire human reaction times from a sequential reaction time task, to which we fit a model that formulates the amount of temporal discounting as a single free parameter. From the parameter, we calculate each individuals estimate of the latent space. We find that neural activity reflects these estimates mostly in the temporal lobe, including areas involved in spatial navigation. Similar to spatial navigation, we find that low dimensional representations of neural activity allow for easy separation of important features, such as modules, in the latent space. Lastly, we take advantage of the high temporal resolution of iEEG data to determine the time scale on which latent spaces are learned. We find that learning typically happens within the first 500 trials, and is modulated by the underlying latent space and the amount of temporal discounting characteristic of each participant. Ultimately, this work provides important links between behavioral models of sequence learning and neural activity during the same behavior, and contextualizes these results within a broader framework of domain general cognitive maps.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Field percentile
- top 22%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Learning predictive cognitive maps with spiking neurons during behaviour and replays.
Jacopo Bono, Sara Zannone, … Claudia Clopath A·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jan 13, 2023
- Learning produces a hippocampal cognitive map in the form of an orthogonalized state machine
Weinan Sun, Johan Winnubst, … Nelson Spruston·bioRxiv·Aug 3, 2023
- Replay in human visual cortex is linked to the formation of successor representations and independent of consciousness
Lennart Wittkuhn, Lena M. Krippner, … Nicolas W. Schuck·bioRxiv·Feb 2, 2022
- Spatial learning in multi-scale environments: Roles of hippocampus, orbitofrontal cortex, and retrosplenial cortex
Yidan Qiu, Senning Zheng, … Ruiwang Huang·bioRxiv·Oct 20, 2025
- A surprising link between cognitive maps, successor-relation based reinforcement learning, and BTSP
Yukun Yang, Christoph Stöckl, Wolfgang Maass·bioRxiv·Apr 22, 2025
- Latent learning drives sleep-dependent plasticity in distinct CA1 subpopulations
Wei Guo, Jie J. Zhang, … Matthew A. Wilson·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 28, 2024