Automating Candidate Gene Prioritization with Large Language Models: From Naive Scoring to Literature-Grounded Validation
Taushif KhaniD, Mohammed ToufiqiD, Marina YurievaiD, Nitaya IndrawattanaiD, Akanitt JittmittraphapiD, Nathamon KosoltanapiwatiD, Pornpan PumiratiD, Passanesh SukphopetchiD, Muthita VanaporniD, Karolina PaluckaiD, Basirudeen Syed Ahamed KabeeriD, Darawan RinchaiiD, Damien ChaussabeliD
Abstract
BackgroundIdentifying promising therapeutic targets from thousands of genes in transcriptomic studies remains a major bottleneck in biomedical research. While large language models (LLMs) show potential for gene prioritization, they suffer from hallucination and lack systematic validation against expert knowledge. MethodsWe developed a two-stage computational framework that combines LLM-based screening with literature validation for systematic gene prioritization. Starting with 10,824 genes from the BloodGen3 repertoire, we applied multi-criteria evaluation for sepsis relevance, followed by retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) using 6,346 curated sepsis publications. A novel faithfulness evaluation system verified that LLM predictions aligned with retrieved literature evidence. ResultsThe framework identified 609 sepsis-relevant genes with >94% filtering efficiency, demonstrating strong enrichment for inflammatory pathways including TNF- signaling, complement activation, and interferon responses. Literature validation yielded 30 ultra-high confidence therapeutic candidates, including both established sepsis genes (IL10, TREM1, S100A9, NLRP3) and novel targets warranting investigation. Benchmark validation against expert-curated databases achieved 71.2% recall, with systematic correlation between computational confidence and evidence quality. The final candidate set balanced discovery (11 novel genes) with validation (19 known genes), maintaining biological coherence throughout the filtering process. ConclusionsThis framework demonstrates that rigorous methodology can transform unreliable LLM outputs into systematically validated biological insights. By combining computational efficiency with literature grounding, the approach provides a practical tool for prioritizing experimental validation efforts. The modular design enables adaptation to other diseases through knowledge base substitution, offering a systematic approach to literature-guided biomarker discovery. AvailabilitySource code and implementation details are available at https://github.com/taushifkhan/llm-geneprioritization-framework, vector database at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15802241 and Interactive demonstration at https://llm-geneprioritization.streamlit.app/
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Field percentile
- top 37%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Clinical and Cross-Domain Validation of an LLM-Guided, Literature-Based Gene Prioritization Framework
Taushif Khan, Ansarullah A, … Damien Chaussabel·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2026
- Automating Candidate Gene Prioritization with Large Language Models: Development and Benchmarking of an API-Driven Workflow Leveraging GPT-4
Taushif Khan, Mohammed Toufiq, … Damien Chaussabel·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2024
- Biological rationales from language models enable leakage-resistant forecasts of target-indication success
Wanheng Zhang, Jie Xu, … Chong Wu·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2026
- Accelerating Drug Repurposing with AI: The Role of Large Language Models in Hypothesis Validation
Iratxe Zunzunegui Sanz, Belén Otero-Carrasco, Alejandro Rodríguez‐González·Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical SystemsPeer-reviewed·Jun 18, 2025
- Evaluating Large Language Models for Gene-to-Phenotype Mapping: The Critical Role of Full-Text Database Access
Nicolas Matthew Suhardi, Anastasia Oktarina, … Vincentius Jeremy Suhardi·bioRxiv·Jun 11, 2025
- Quantifying Scientific Consensus in Biomedical Hypotheses via LLM-Assisted Literature Screening
Uiyun Kim, Ohhyeon Kwon, Doheon Lee·bioRxiv·Apr 9, 2026