Sign in
BioinformaticsBioinformatics
Peer-reviewed journal article

Automating Candidate Gene Prioritization with Large Language Models: From Naive Scoring to Literature-Grounded Validation

Taushif KhaniD, Mohammed ToufiqiD, Marina YurievaiD, Nitaya IndrawattanaiD, Akanitt JittmittraphapiD, Nathamon KosoltanapiwatiD, Pornpan PumiratiD, Passanesh SukphopetchiD, Muthita VanaporniD, Karolina PaluckaiD, Basirudeen Syed Ahamed KabeeriD, Darawan RinchaiiD, Damien ChaussabeliD

Abstract

BackgroundIdentifying promising therapeutic targets from thousands of genes in transcriptomic studies remains a major bottleneck in biomedical research. While large language models (LLMs) show potential for gene prioritization, they suffer from hallucination and lack systematic validation against expert knowledge. MethodsWe developed a two-stage computational framework that combines LLM-based screening with literature validation for systematic gene prioritization. Starting with 10,824 genes from the BloodGen3 repertoire, we applied multi-criteria evaluation for sepsis relevance, followed by retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) using 6,346 curated sepsis publications. A novel faithfulness evaluation system verified that LLM predictions aligned with retrieved literature evidence. ResultsThe framework identified 609 sepsis-relevant genes with >94% filtering efficiency, demonstrating strong enrichment for inflammatory pathways including TNF- signaling, complement activation, and interferon responses. Literature validation yielded 30 ultra-high confidence therapeutic candidates, including both established sepsis genes (IL10, TREM1, S100A9, NLRP3) and novel targets warranting investigation. Benchmark validation against expert-curated databases achieved 71.2% recall, with systematic correlation between computational confidence and evidence quality. The final candidate set balanced discovery (11 novel genes) with validation (19 known genes), maintaining biological coherence throughout the filtering process. ConclusionsThis framework demonstrates that rigorous methodology can transform unreliable LLM outputs into systematically validated biological insights. By combining computational efficiency with literature grounding, the approach provides a practical tool for prioritizing experimental validation efforts. The modular design enables adaptation to other diseases through knowledge base substitution, offering a systematic approach to literature-guided biomarker discovery. AvailabilitySource code and implementation details are available at https://github.com/taushifkhan/llm-geneprioritization-framework, vector database at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15802241 and Interactive demonstration at https://llm-geneprioritization.streamlit.app/

PDFDOICode

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISKhan '26Khan '24Zhang '26Sanz '25Suhardi '25Kim '26
71% semantic matchBioinformatics
Taushif Khan, Ansarullah A, Joshy George+4 more·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2026