henhaobio
Sign in

Development and PsychopathologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Resilient functioning is associated with altered structural brain network topology in adolescents exposed to childhood adversity.

Nadia González GarcíaiD, Elizabeth E.L. BuimeriD, Laura Moreno-LópeziD, Samantha N. SallieiD, František VášaiD, Sol I. LimiD, Rafael Romero-GarcíaiD, Maximilian ScheupleiniD, Kirstie Jane WhitakeriD, Peter Brian JonesiD, Raymond J. DolaniD, Peter FonagyiD, Ian Michael GoodyeriD, Edward Thomas BullmoreiD, Anne‐Laura van HarmeleniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Childhood adversity is one of the strongest predictors of adolescent mental illness. Therefore, it is critical that the mechanisms that aid resilient functioning in individuals exposed to childhood adversity are better understood. Here, we examined whether resilient functioning was related to structural brain network topology. We quantified resilient functioning at the individual level as psychosocial functioning adjusted for the severity of childhood adversity in a large sample of adolescents (N=2406, aged 14-24). Next, we examined nodal degree (the number of connections that brain regions have in a network) using brain-wide cortical thickness measures in a representative subset (N=275) using a sliding window approach. We found that higher resilient functioning was associated with lower nodal degree of multiple regions including the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the medial prefrontal cortex, and the posterior superior temporal sulcus (z > 1.645). During adolescence, decreases in nodal degree are thought to reflect a normative developmental process that is part of the extensive remodelling of structural brain network topology. Prior findings in this sample showed that decreased nodal degree was associated with age, as such our findings of negative associations between nodal degree and resilient functioning may therefore potentially resemble a more mature structural network configuration in individuals with higher resilient functioning.

Citations
13
FWCI
3.78
Field percentile
top 7%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISHughes-Smal '25Váša '17Risner '26Kim '19Stanford '22Park '21
70% semantic matchNeuroscience