Diagnostic Yield And Treatment Impact Of Targeted Exome Sequencing In Early-Onset Epilepsy
Michelle K. DemosiD, Ilaria Guella, C DeGuzman, Marna B. McKenzieiD, Sarah E. BuerkiiD, Daniel M. EvansiD, Eric B. ToyotaiD, Cyrus G. BoelmaniD, Linda L. HuhiD, Anita DattaiD, Aspasia Michoulas, Kathryn A. SelbyiD, Bruce BjörnsoniD, Gabriella Ana HorvathiD, Elena Lopez‐RangeliD, Clara van KarnebeekiD, Ramona SalvarinovaiD, Erin Slade, Patrice Eydoux, Shelin AdamiD, Margot I. Van Allen, Tanya N. NelsoniD, Corneliu BolboceaniD, Mary B. ConnollyiD, Matthew James FarreriD
Abstract
BackgroundTo examine the impact on diagnosis, treatment and cost with early use of targeted whole-exome sequencing (WES) in early-onset epilepsy.\n\nMethodsWES was performed on 50 patients with early-onset epilepsy ([≤] 5 years) of unknown cause. Patients were classified as retrospective (epilepsy diagnosis > 6 months) or prospective (epilepsy diagnosis < 6 months). WES was performed on an Ion ProtonTM and variant reporting was restricted to the sequences of 565 known epilepsy genes. Diagnostic yield and time to diagnosis were calculated. An analysis of cost and impact on treatment was also performed.\n\nResultsA likely/definite diagnosis was made in 17/50 patients (34%) with immediate treatment implications in 8/17 (47%). A possible diagnosis was identified in 9 additional patients (18%) for whom supporting evidence is pending. Time from epilepsy onset to genetic diagnosis was faster when WES was performed early in the diagnostic process (mean: 143 days prospective versus 2,172 days retrospective). Costs of prior negative tests averaged $8,344 in the retrospective group, suggesting savings of up to $5,110 per patient.\n\nInterpretationThese results support the clinical utility and potential cost-effectiveness of using targeted WES early in the diagnostic workup of patients with unexplained early-onset epilepsy. The costs and clinical benefits are likely to continue to improve. Advances in precision medicine and further studies regarding impact on long-term clinical outcome will be important.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 100
- FWCI
- 10.19
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- 'Exome first' approach can reduce diagnostic costs and time - retrospective single centre analysis of 111 individuals with rare neurodevelopmental disorders
Julia Klau, Rami Abou Jamra, … Bernt Popp·European Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 24, 2021
- Whole Exome Sequencing in Neurogenetic Diagnostic Odysseys: An Argentinian Experience
M Córdoba, SA Rodriguez-Quiroga, … MA Kauffman·bioRxiv·Jun 23, 2016
- Cost and Clinical Utility of WES and WGS in pediatric patients with suspected genetic disease
Michael P. Douglas, Patricia A. Deverka, … Kathryn A. Phillips·medRxiv·Oct 10, 2022
- Clinical and molecular diagnostic study of 320 Chinese children with epilepsy by Genome Sequencing
Dongfang Zou, Lin Wang, … Jian Guo·BrainPeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2021
- Clinical signatures of genetic epilepsy precede diagnosis in electronic medical records of 32,000 individuals
Peter D. Galer, Shridhar Parthasarathy, … Ingo Helbig·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jul 14, 2024
- Precision medicine for developmental and epileptic encephalopathies in Africa: strategies for a resource-limited setting.
Alina Izabela Esterhuizen, Nicki Tiffin, … Gemma L. Carvill·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Dec 8, 2022