DeepSVP: Integration of genotype and phenotype for structural variant prioritization using deep learning
Azza AlthagafiiD, Lamia AlsubaieiD, Nagarajan KathiresaniD, Katsuhiko MinetaiD, Taghrid AlorainiiD, Fuad Al MutairiiD, Majid AlfadheliD, Takashi GojoboriiD, Ahmed A. AlfaresiD, Robert HoehndorfiD
Abstract
MotivationStructural genomic variants account for much of human variability and are involved in several diseases. Structural variants are complex and may affect coding regions of multiple genes, or affect the functions of genomic regions in different ways from single nucleotide variants. Interpreting the phenotypic consequences of structural variants relies on information about gene functions, haploinsufficiency or triplosensitivity, and other genomic features. Phenotype-based methods to identifying variants that are involved in genetic diseases combine molecular features with prior knowledge about the phenotypic consequences of altering gene functions. While phenotype-based methods have been applied successfully to single nucleotide variants as well as short insertions and deletions, the complexity of structural variants makes it more challenging to link them to phenotypes. Furthermore, structural variants can affect a large number of coding regions, and phenotype information may not be available for all of them. ResultsWe developed DeepSVP, a computational method to prioritize structural variants involved in genetic diseases by combining genomic and gene functions information. We incorporate phenotypes linked to genes, functions of gene products, gene expression in individual celltypes, and anatomical sites of expression, and systematically relate them to their phenotypic consequences through ontologies and machine learning. DeepSVP significantly improves the success rate of finding causative variants in several benchmarks and can identify novel pathogenic structural variants in consanguineous families. Availabilityhttps://github.com/bio-ontology-research-group/DeepSVP Contactrobert.hoehndorf@kaust.edu.sa
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 16
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Field percentile
- top 14%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- DeepPVP: phenotype-based prioritization of causative variants using deep learning
Imane Boudellioua, Maxat Kulmanov, … Robert Hoehndorf·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 6, 2019
- Prioritization of genes driving congenital phenotypes of patients with de novo genomic structural variants
Sjors Middelkamp, Judith M. Vlaar, … Edwin P. J. G. Cuppen·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2019
- SVFX: a machine-learning framework to quantify the pathogenicity of structural variants
Sushant Kumar, Arif O. Harmanci, … Mark Gerstein·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 9, 2020
- SVScore: An Impact Prediction Tool For Structural Variation
Liron Ganel, Haley J Abel, Ira M Hall·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2016
- A deep learning framework for structural variant discovery and genotyping
Victoria Popic, Chris Rohlicek, … Iman Hajirasouliha·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2022
- Mining Thousands of Genomes to Classify Somatic and Pathogenic Structural Variants
Ryan M. Layer, Fritz Joachim Sedlazeck, … Aaron R. Quinlan·bioRxiv·Apr 21, 2021