Prioritization of genes driving congenital phenotypes of patients with de novo genomic structural variants
Sjors MiddelkampiD, Judith M. Vlaar, Jacques C. GiltayiD, Jerome KorzeliusiD, Nicolle J.M. BesselinkiD, Sander BoymansiD, Roel JansseniD, Lisanne de la Fonteijne, Ellen van BinsbergeniD, Markus J. van RoosmaleniD, Ron HochstenbachiD, Daniela Francesca GiachinoiD, Michael E. TalkowskiiD, Wigard P. KloostermaniD, Edwin P. J. G. CuppeniD
Abstract
BackgroundGenomic structural variants (SVs) can affect many genes and regulatory elements. Therefore, the molecular mechanisms driving the phenotypes of patients with multiple congenital abnormalities and/or intellectual disability carrying de novo SVs are frequently unknown.\n\nResultsWe applied a combination of systematic experimental and bioinformatic methods to improve the molecular diagnosis of 39 patients with de novo SVs and an inconclusive diagnosis after regular genetic testing. In seven of these cases (18%) whole genome sequencing analysis detected disease-relevant complexities of the SVs missed in routine microarray-based analyses. We developed a computational tool to predict effects on genes directly affected by SVs and on genes indirectly affected due to changes in chromatin organization and impact on regulatory mechanisms. By combining these functional predictions with extensive phenotype information, candidate driver genes were identified in 16/39 (41%) patients. In eight cases evidence was found for involvement of multiple candidate drivers contributing to different parts of the phenotypes. Subsequently, we applied this computational method to a collection of 382 patients with previously detected and classified de novo SVs and identified candidate driver genes in 210 cases (54%), including 32 cases whose SVs were previously not classified as pathogenic. Pathogenic positional effects were predicted in 25% of the cases with balanced SVs and in 8% of the cases with copy number variants.\n\nConclusionsThese results show that driver gene prioritization based on integrative analysis of WGS data with phenotype association and chromatin organization datasets can improve the molecular diagnosis of patients with de novo SVs.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 26
- FWCI
- 2.55
- Field percentile
- top 10%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- DeepSVP: Integration of genotype and phenotype for structural variant prioritization using deep learning
Azza Althagafi, Lamia Alsubaie, … Robert Hoehndorf·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2021
- Systematic assessment of the contribution of structural variants to inherited retinal diseases
Shu Wen, Meng Wang, … Rui Chen·Human Molecular GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 22, 2023
- SVScore: An Impact Prediction Tool For Structural Variation
Liron Ganel, Haley J Abel, Ira M Hall·bioRxiv·Sep 6, 2016
- Systematic assessment of rare and de novo structural variants in 57 patient-parent trios using optical genome mapping
Bart P. G. H. van der Sanden, Sandra Vorimo, … Alexander Hoischen·medRxiv·Jan 21, 2026
- ClinSV: Clinical grade structural and copy number variant detection from whole genome sequencing data
André E. Minoche, Ben Lundie, … Mark J. Cowley·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 25, 2021
- Detecting cryptic clinically-relevant structural variation in exome sequencing data increases diagnostic yield for developmental disorders
Eugene J. Gardner, Alejandro Sifrim, … Matthew E. Hurles·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 8, 2021