Imaging NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Visual cortical area contributions to the transient, multifocal and steady-state VEP: A forward model-informed analysis
Abstract
Central to our understanding of how visual evoked potentials (VEPs) contribute to visual processing is the question of where their anatomical sources are. Three well-established measures of low-level visual cortical activity are widely used: the first component ("C1") of the transient and multifocal VEP, and the steady-state VEP (SSVEP). Although primary visual cortex (V1) activity has often been implicated in the generation of all three signals, their dominant sources remain uncertain due to the limited resolution and methodological heterogeneity of source modelling. Here, we provide the first characterisation of all three signals in one analytic framework centred on the cruciform model, which describes how scalp topographies of V1 activity vary with stimulus location due to the retinotopy and unique folding pattern of V1. We measured the transient C1, multifocal C1, and SSVEPs driven by an 18.75Hz and 7.5Hz flicker, and regressed them against forward-models of areas V1, V2 and V3 generated from the Benson-2014 retinotopy atlas. The topographic variations of all four VEP signals across the visual field were better captured by V1 models, explaining between 2-6 times more variance than V2/V3. Models with all three visual areas improved fit further, but complementary analyses of temporal dynamics across all three signals indicated that the bulk of extrastriate contributions occur considerably later than V1. Overall, our data support the use of peak C1 amplitude and SSVEPs to probe V1 activity, although the SSVEP contains stronger extrastriate contributions. Moreover, we provide elaborated heuristics to distinguish visual areas in VEP data based on signal lateralization as well as polarity inversion.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Field percentile
- top 9%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Neural Sources Underlying Visual Word Form Processing as Revealed by Steady State Visual Evoked Potentials (SSVEP)
Fang Wang, Blair Kaneshiro, … Bruce D. McCandliss·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Sep 14, 2021
- Cortico-cortical feedback from V2 exerts a powerful influence over the visually evoked local field potential and associated spike timing in V1
Till S. Hartmann, Sruti Raja, … Richard T. Born·bioRxiv·Oct 3, 2019
- Retinotopic biases in contextual feedback signals to V1 for object and scene processing
Matthew Bennett, Lucy S. Petro, … Lars F. Muckli·Current Research in NeurobiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 23, 2024
- An encoding model of temporal processing in human visual cortex
Anthony Stigliani A, Brianna Jeska, Kalanit Grill-spector A·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2017
- Sustained High- and Low-Frequency Neural Responses to Visual Stimuli in Scalp EEG
Edden M. Gerber, Leon Y. Deouell·bioRxiv·Mar 28, 2018
- The amplitude and latency of the earliest signal in V1 encode bottom-up saliency by feature conjunction
Chen Wu, Xiaoning Li, … Jinyou Zou·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Apr 24, 2026