Sign in
GenomicsFrontiers in Plant Science
Peer-reviewed journal article

Genomic evidence that governmentally produced Cannabis sativa poorly represents genetic variation available in state markets

Daniela VergaraiD, Ezra L. HuscheriD, Kyle G. KeepersiD, Rahul PisupatiiD, Anna L. SchwabeiD, Mitchell E. McGlaughliniD, Nolan C. KaneiD

Abstract

The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) is the sole producer of Cannabis for research purposes in the United States, including medical investigation. Previous research established that cannabinoid profiles in the NIDA varieties lacked diversity and potency relative to the Cannabis produced commercially. Additionally, microsatellite marker analyses have established that the NIDA varieties are genetically divergent form varieties produced in the private legal market. Here, we analyzed the genome of multiple Cannabis varieties from diverse lineages including two produced by NIDA, and we provide further support that NIDAs varieties differ from widely available medical, recreational, or industrial Cannabis. Furthermore, our results suggest that NIDAs varieties lack diversity in the single copy portion of the genome, the maternally inherited genomes, the cannabinoid genes, and in the repetitive content of the genome. Therefore, results based on NIDAs varieties are not generalizable regarding the effects of Cannabis after consumption. For medical research to be relevant, material that is more widely used would have to be studied. Clearly, having research to date dominated by a single, non-representative source of Cannabis has hindered scientific investigation.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSchwabe '19Vergara '16Lynch '15Schwabe '19Johnson '21Aina '25
77% semantic matchGenetics
Anna L. Schwabe, Connor J. Hansen, Richard M. Hyslop+1 more·bioRxiv·Mar 28, 2019· 38 citations