bioRxivPhysiologyPreprint
Physiological factors of importance for load carriage
Manne Godhe, Torbjoern Helge, C. Mikael MattssoniD, Oerjan EkblomiD, Bjoern EkblomiD
Abstract
The energy expenditure during carrying no load, 20, 35 and 50 kg at two walking speeds, 3 and 5 km h-1, was studied in 36 healthy participants, 19 men (30 {+/-} 6 yrs, 82.5 {+/-} 7.0 kg) and 17 women (29 {+/-} 6 yrs, 66.1 {+/-} 8.9 kg). Anthropometric data, leg muscle strength as well as trunk muscle endurance and muscle fibre distribution of the thigh were also obtained. To load the participant a standard backpack filled with extra weight according to the carrying weight tested was used. Extra Load Index (ELI), the oxygen uptake (VO2) during total load over no-load-exercise, was used as a proxy for load carrying ability. In addition to analyzing factors of importance for the ELI values, we also conducted mediator analyzes using sex and long term carrying experience as causal variables for ELI as the outcome value.\n\nFor the lowest load (20 kg), ELI20, was correlated with body mass but no other factors. Walking at 5 km h-1 body mass, body height, leg muscle strength and absolute VO2max were correlated to ELI35 and ELI50, but relative VO2max, trunk muscle endurance and leg muscle fibre distribution were not.\n\nSex as causal factor was evaluated in a mediator analyses with ELI50 as outcome. ELI50 at 5 km h-1 differed between the sexes. The limit for acceptable body load, 40 % of VO2max (according to [A]strand, 1967), was nearly reached for women carrying 35 kg (39%) and surpassed at 50 kg at 3 km h-1, and for men carrying 50 kg at 5 km h-1. This difference was only mediated by difference in body mass. Neither muscle fibre distribution, leg muscle strength, trunk muscle endurance and body height nor did absolute or relative VO2max explain the difference.\n\nParticipants with long term experience of heavy load carrying had significant lower ELI20 and ELI50 values than those with minor or non-experience, but none of the above studied factors could explain this difference.\n\nThe study showed that body mass and experience of carrying heavy loads are important factors for the ability to carry heavy loads.\n\nFundingThis study was founded by the Swedish Military Forces{acute} Research Authority and The Research Funds of The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences.\n\nAbbreviations
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Training load and body composition in adults practicing cyclical exercises
R. S. B. Silva, M. F. Souza, … A. S. Silva·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2019
- External and Internal Load Profiles of Male and Female Participants during a Walking Football Practice
Júlio A. Costa, Catarina Pereira, … Bruno V. Gonçalves·bioRxiv·Jan 15, 2025
- The Impact of Body Mass Index on Physical Activity and Cardiac Workload
M. J. Bloom, L. M. Brown, … E. F. Valderrama·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2021
- E-bike riding: A metabolic evaluation in the context of exercise intensity domains
Alberto Bonardi, Francesco Negro, Danilo Iannetta·Journal of Transport & HealthPeer-reviewed·May 9, 2025
- Biomechanical effects of load-carrying in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a subject-specific musculoskeletal modelling study
Rounak Bhattacharya, Bhavuk Garg, … Kaushik Mukherjee·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2026
- Weighted Shoes in the Wild: Initial Insights into the Relationship Between the Effort of Walking and the Amount of Walking Performed
M. R. Wu, P. G. Adamczyk, S. H. Collins·bioRxiv·Nov 18, 2021