henhaobio
Sign in

Journal of Transport & HealthPhysiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

E-bike riding: A metabolic evaluation in the context of exercise intensity domains

Alberto BonardiiD, Francesco NegroiD, Danilo IannettaiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

IntroductionE-bikes are being promoted as a mode of transportation that can aid with meeting current physical activity guidelines. This study evaluated exertional intensity associated with E-Biking within the exercise intensity domain framework. We hypothesized that exertional intensity of E-bikes is insufficient to evoke a metabolic demand associated with the minimum intensity needed to improve cardiorespiratory fitness. MethodsForty-four participants (22 females) of varying activity levels completed two experimental sessions. The first session involved a lab-based ramp-incremental exercise test to determine [V]O2max, gas exchange threshold (GET), and respiratory compensation point (RCP). The second session involved the completion of two outdoor rides on the same bike equipped with an electrical motor E-bike. The first ride was completed without electrical assistance, while the second was. The power output (PO) and speed were set at an intensity corresponding to [~]10% above GET. ResultsAs expected, using E-bike assistance resulted in a lower metabolic demand, falling well below GET. While the absolute power output (PO) was different between sexes, relative heart rate (HR) and relative PO were similar between the rides without and with assistance. This suggests that when riding an E-bike, the internal load is similar between sexes. ConclusionDespite E-bikes facilitate a more active lifestyle and help to reduce the emission of pollutants, when interpreted within the context of the exercise intensity domain schema, their associated exertional intensity is likely insufficient to confidently elicit cardiorespiratory benefits.

Citations
3
FWCI
3.15
Field percentile
top 10%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISFinnegan '23Kirner '25Gupta '26Godhe '17Wilson '25Jung '26
59% semantic matchNeuroscience
Sarah Finnegan, David Dearlove, Peter Morris+4 more·PLoS ONE·Apr 21, 2023· 21 citations