RNABioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Biological classification with RNA-Seq data: Can alternative splicing enhance machine learning classifier?
Nathan T. JohnsoniD, Andi DhrosoiD, Katelyn J. Hughes, Dmitry KorkiniD
Abstract
The extent to which the genes are expressed in the cell can be simplistically defined as a function of one or more factors of the environment, lifestyle, and genetics. RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) is becoming a prevalent approach to quantify gene expression, and is expected to gain better insights to a number of biological and biomedical questions, compared to the DNA microarrays. Most importantly, RNA-Seq allows to quantify expression at the gene and alternative splicing isoform levels. However, leveraging the RNA-Seq data requires development of new data mining and analytics methods. Supervised machine learning methods are commonly used approaches for biological data analysis, and have recently gained attention for their applications to the RNA-Seq data.\n\nIn this work, we assess the utility of supervised learning methods trained on RNA-Seq data for a diverse range of biological classification tasks. We hypothesize that the isoform-level expression data is more informative for biological classification tasks than the gene-level expression data. Our large-scale assessment is done through utilizing multiple datasets, organisms, lab groups, and RNA-Seq analysis pipelines. Overall, we performed and assessed 61 biological classification problems that leverage three independent RNA-Seq datasets and include over 2,000 samples that come from multiple organisms, lab groups, and RNA-Seq analyses. These 61 problems include predictions of the tissue type, sex, or age of the sample, healthy or cancerous phenotypes and, the pathological tumor stage for the samples from the cancerous tissue. For each classification problem, the performance of three normalization techniques and six machine learning classifiers was explored. We find that for every single classification problem, the isoform-based classifiers outperform or are comparable with gene expression based methods. The top-performing supervised learning techniques reached a near perfect classification accuracy, demonstrating the utility of supervised learning for RNA-Seq based data analysis.
- organism: multiple species
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 52
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Field percentile
- top 11%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Machine Learning-Based State-Of-The-Art Methods For The Classification Of RNA-Seq Data
Almas Jabeen, Nadeem Ahmad, Khalid Raza·Lecture notes in computational vision and biomechanicsPeer-reviewed·Nov 13, 2017
- Classification of RNA-Seq Data via Bagging Support Vector Machines
Gokmen Zararsiz, Dincer Goksuluk, … Turgay Unver·bioRxiv·Jul 28, 2014
- Using supervised learning methods for gene selection in RNA-Seq case-control studies
Stéphane Wenric, Ruhollah Shemirani·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 3, 2018
- A sparse negative binomial classifier with covariateadjustment for RNA-seq data
Tanbin Rahman, Hsin-En Huang, … George C. Tseng·The Annals of Applied StatisticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2022
- PanClassif: Improving pan cancer classification of single cell RNA-seq using machine learning
Kazi Ferdous Mahin, Md. Robiuddin, … Swakkhar Shatabda·GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jan 6, 2022
- Clustering of mRNA-Seq data for detection of alternative splicing patterns
Marla Johnson, Elizabeth Purdom·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2015