Vestibular and proprioceptive contributions to trunk stabilization differs across postural tasks and walking speeds.
Yiyuan C. LiiD, Sjoerd M. BruijniD, Koen K. LemaireiD, Simon BrumagneiD, Jaap H. van DieëniD
Abstract
Stabilizing the upright posture of the trunk relies on vestibular and proprioceptive afference. Previous studies found that the feedback responses to sensory afference vary between postures and tasks. We investigated whether and how vestibular and proprioceptive afference contribute to trunk stabilization during different postural tasks, and during walking at different speeds. Twelve healthy adults performed tasks in a random order: sitting, standing on the right foot or both feet, and treadmill walking at five speeds: 0.8, 2.0, 3.2, 4.3 and 5.5 km/h, while exposed to unilateral muscle vibration on the right paraspinal muscles at the level of the second lumbar vertebra, or to a step-like electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS) with the anode behind the left ear. The mediolateral displacements of markers at the sixth thoracic level and sacrum in the global coordinate system were used to evaluate the responses to sensory stimulation. No significant responses to EVS at T6 and sacrum level were found in sitting and standing. Responses to muscle vibration were significant and differed between unipedal standing compared to sitting and bipedal standing. The latter suggests a different interpretation of the sensation of muscle lengthening in these postures. During walking, the magnitude of the responses to both stimuli increased from very slow speeds to moderate speeds. From moderate to higher speeds, responses to muscle vibration decreased, whereas responses to EVS plateaued. These findings suggest speed-dependent modulation of vestibular and proprioceptive contributions in trunk stabilization during walking. Summary statementBy applying electrical vestibular stimulation and muscle vibration, we found that how vestibular and proprioceptive signals are used for trunk stabilization differs between postural tasks and walking speeds.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.13
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Stabilization demands of walking modulate the vestibular contributions to gait
Rina Márcia Magnani, Sjoerd M. Bruijn, … Patrick Alan Forbes·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 2, 2021
- Effects of vestibular stimulation on gait stability when walking at different step widths
Rina Márcia Magnani, Jaap H. van Dieën, Sjoerd M. Bruijn·Experimental Brain ResearchPeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2022
- Vertebral level specific modulation of paraspinal muscle activity based on vestibular signals during walking.
Y. C. Li, S. M. Bruijn, … J. H. van Dieen·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 22, 2024
- The effect of head orientation on vestibular signal-based modulation of paraspinal muscle activity during walking
Yiyuan C. Li, Koen K. Lemaire, … Jaap H. van Dieën·European Journal of Applied PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 4, 2024
- Balance Control Mechanisms Do Not Benefit From Successive Stimulation Of Different Sensory Systems
Jean-Philippe Cyr, Noémie Anctil, Martin Simoneau·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Dec 11, 2019
- Triceps Surae Muscle Ia Proprioceptive Weighting During Quiet Stance with Vision Occlusion
Gordon Chalmers·bioRxiv·Jun 25, 2025