Corticothalamic Projections Gate Alpha Rhythms in the Pulvinar
Nelson CortesiD, Reza Abbas FarishtaiD, Hugo LadretiD, Christian CasanovaiD
Abstract
Two types of corticothalamic (CT) terminals reach the pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus, and their distribution varies according to the hierarchical level of the cortical area they originate from. While type 2 terminals are more abundant at lower hierarchical levels, terminals from higher cortical areas mostly exhibit type 1 axons. Such terminals also evoke different excitatory postsynaptic potential dynamic profiles, presenting facilitation for type 1 and depression for type 2. As the pulvinar is involved in the oscillatory regulation between intercortical areas, fundamental questions about the role of these different terminal types in the neuronal communication throughout the cortical hierarchy are yielded. Our theoretical results support that the co-action of the two types of terminals produces different oscillatory rhythms in pulvinar neurons. More precisely, terminal types 1 and 2 produce alpha-band oscillations at a specific range of connectivity weights. Such oscillatory activity is generated by an unstable transition of the balanced state networks properties that it is found between the quiescent state and the stable asynchronous spike response state. While CT projections from areas 17 and 21a are arranged in the model as the empirical proportion of terminals types 1 and 2, the actions of these two cortical connections are antagonistic. As area 17 generates low-band oscillatory activity, cortical area 21a shifts pulvinar responses to stable asynchronous spiking activity and vice-versa when area 17 produces an asynchronous state. To further investigate such oscillatory effects through corticothalamo-cortical projections, the transthalamic pathway, we created a cortical feedforward network of two cortical areas, 17 and 21a, with CT connections to a pulvinar-like network. With this model, the transthalamic pathway propagates alpha waves from the pulvinar to area 21a. This oscillatory transfer ceases when reciprocal connections from area 21a reach the pulvinar, closing the cortico-thalamic loop. Taken together, results of our model suggest that the pulvnar shows a bi-stable spiking activity, oscillatory or regular asynchronous spiking, whose responses are gated by the different activation of cortico-pulvinar projections from lower to higher-order areas such as areas 17 and 21a.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Field percentile
- top 26%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A causal role for pulvinar in coordinating task independent corticocorticalinteractions
Manoj Kumar Eradath, Mark A. Pinsk, Sabine Kästner·The Journal of Comparative NeurologyPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2021
- Engagement of pulvino-cortical feedforward and feedback pathways in cognitive computations
Jorge Jaramillo, Jorge F. Mejías, Xiao‐Jing Wang·NeuronPeer-reviewed·Dec 12, 2018
- Complementary Organization of Driver and Modulator Cortico-Thalamo-Cortical Circuits
Rachel M. Cassidy, Angel V. Macias, … Edward M. Callaway·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2025
- Causal role for pulvinar burst firing in thalamo-cortical attention control
Rober Boshra, Michael Harris, … Sabine Kästner·bioRxiv·Sep 16, 2025
- Layer 6 corticothalamic neurons induce high gamma oscillations through cortico-cortical and cortico-thalamo-cortical pathways
Simone Russo, Elaida D. Dimwamwa, Garrett B. Stanley·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 9, 2025
- Thalamocortical spectral transmission relies on balanced input strengths
Matteo Saponati, Jordi García‐Ojalvo, … Alberto Mazzoni·Brain TopographyPeer-reviewed·Jun 4, 2021