To include or not to include: The impact of gene filtering on species tree estimation methods
Abstract
Species tree estimation from loci sampled from multiple genomes is now common, but is challenged by the heterogeneity across the genome due to multiple processes, such as gene duplication and loss, horizontal gene transfer, and incomplete lineage sorting. Although methods for estimating species trees have been developed that address gene tree heterogeneity due to incomplete lineage sorting, many of these methods operate by combining estimated gene trees and are hence vulnerable to gene tree quality. There is also the added concern that missing data, which is frequently encountered in genome-scale datasets, will impact species tree estimation.\n\nOur study addresses the impact of gene filtering on species trees inferred from multi-gene datasets. We address these questions using a large and heterogeneous collection of simulated datasets both with and without missing data. We compare several established coalescent-based methods (ASTRAL, ASTRID, MP-EST, and SVDquartets within PAUP*) as well as unpartitioned concatenation using maximum likelihood (RAxML).\n\nOur study shows that gene tree error and missing data impact all methods (and some methods degrade more than others), but the degree of incomplete lineage sorting and gene tree estimation error impacts the absolute and relative performance of methods as well as their response to gene filtering strategies. We find that filtering genes based on the degree of missing data is either neutral or else reduces the accuracy of all five methods examined, and so is not recommended. Filtering genes based on gene tree estimation error shows somewhat different trends. Under low levels of incomplete lineage sorting, removing genes with high gene tree estimation error can improve the accuracy of summary methods, but only if not too many genes are removed. Otherwise, filtering genes tends to increase error, especially under high levels of incomplete lineage sorting. Hence, while filtering genes based on missing data is not recommended, there are conditions under which removing high error gene trees can improve species tree estimation. This study provides insights into prior studies and suggests approaches for analyzing phylogenomic datasets.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- "Correcting'' gene trees to be more like species trees increases topological error when incomplete lineage sorting is high
Z. Yan, H. Ogilvie, L. Nakhleh·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2022
- Comparing Methods for Species Tree Estimation With Gene Duplication and Loss
J. Willson, M. Roddur, T. Warnow·bioRxiv·Feb 5, 2021
- STELAR: A statistically consistent coalescent-based species tree estimation method by maximizing triplet consistency
Mazharul Islam, Kowshika Sarker, … Md. Shamsuzzoha Bayzid·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Feb 10, 2020
- The effect of gene tree dependence on summary methods for speciestree inference
Wan-Ting He, Céline Scornavacca, Yao-ban Chan·Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewed·Mar 24, 2026
- TREE-QMC: Improving quartet graph construction for scalable and accurate species tree estimation from gene trees
- Weighting by Gene Tree Uncertainty Improves Accuracy of Quartet-based Species Trees
C. Zhang, S. Mirarab·bioRxiv·Feb 19, 2022