henhao
Sign in
NeuroscienceThe Cerebellum
Peer-reviewed journal article

Reinforcement motor learning after cerebellar damage is related to state estimation

Christopher M. White, Evan C. Snow, Amanda S. TherrieniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Recent work showed that individuals with cerebellar degeneration could leverage intact reinforcement learning (RL) to alter their movement. However, there was marked inter-individual variability in learning, and the factors underlying it were unclear. Cerebellum-dependent sensory prediction may contribute to RL in motor contexts by enhancing body state estimates, which are necessary to solve the credit-assignment problem. The objective of this study was to test the relationship between the predictive component of state estimation and RL in individuals with cerebellar degeneration. Individuals with cerebellar degeneration and neurotypical control participants completed two tasks: an RL task that required them to alter the angle of reaching movements and a state estimation task that tested the somatosensory perception of active and passive movement. The state estimation task permitted calculation of the active benefit shown by each participant, which is thought to reflect the cerebellum-dependent predictive component of state estimation. We found that the cerebellar and control groups showed similar magnitudes of learning with reinforcement and active benefit on average, but there was substantial variability across individuals. Using multiple regression, we assessed potential predictors of RL. Our analysis included active benefit, somatosensory acuity, clinical ataxia severity, movement variability, movement speed, and age. We found a significant relationship in which greater active benefit predicted better learning with reinforcement in the cerebellar, but not the control group. No other variables showed significant relationships with learning. Overall, our results support the hypothesis that the integrity of sensory prediction is a strong predictor of RL after cerebellar damage.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
2
FWCI
0.30
Field percentile
top 47%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISNicholas '23Trach '26Trach '26Sendhilnath '20Tsay '22Ludolph '19
78% semantic matchNeuroscience
Jonathan Nicholas, Christian Johannes Amlang, Chi-Ying Roy Lin+5 more·The Cerebellum·Dec 8, 2023· 23 citations