Quantifying and mitigating recorder-induced variability in ecological acoustic indices
David Luna-NaranjoiD, Juan David Martinez-VargasiD, Camilo Sánchez‐GiraldoiD, Juan M. DazaiD, José David LópeziD
Abstract
Due to the complexity of soundscapes, Ecological Acoustic indices (EAI) are frequently used as metrics to summarize ecologically meaningful information from audio recordings. Recent technological advances have allowed the rapid development of many audio recording devices with significant hardware/firmware variations among brands, whose effects in calculating EAI have not yet be determined. In this work, we show how recordings of the same landscape with different devices effectively hinder reproducibility and produce contradictory results. To address these issues, we propose a preprocessing pipeline to reduce EAI variability resulting from different hardware without altering the target information in the audio. To this end, we tested eight EAI commonly used in soundscape analyses. We targeted three common cases of variability caused by recorder characteristics: sampling frequency, microphone gain variation, and frequency response. We quantified the difference in the probability density functions of each index among recorders according to the Kullback-Leibler divergence. As a result, our approach reduced up to 75% variations among recorders from different brands (AudioMoth and SongMeter) and identified the conditions in which these devices are comparable. In conclusion, we demonstrated that different devices effectively affect EAI and show how these variations can be mitigated. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=130 SRC="FIGDIR/small/562620v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (38K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13defb9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14597d8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f3e795org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e90f2e_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG HighlightsO_LIAddressing recorder-induced biases in acoustic indices for improved reproducibility. C_LIO_LIProposing an effective method to mitigate recorder-related biases. C_LIO_LIEvaluating pipeline proposed performance via acoustic index distribution analysis. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Field percentile
- top 8%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Quantifying ecoacoustic activity in the Amazon rainforest through Information Theory quantifiers
J. G. Colonna, J. R. Carvalho, O. A. Rosso·bioRxiv·Feb 9, 2020
- Is there an accurate and generalisable way to use soundscapes to monitor biodiversity?
S. S. Sethi, A. Bick, … D. A. Coomes·bioRxiv·Dec 19, 2022
- Spatiotemporal Autocorrelation of Acoustic Indices: Implications for Biodiversity Monitoring
Xinyi Jiang, Yixuan Zhang, … Daiping Wang·bioRxiv·Oct 11, 2026
- Towards interpretable learned representations for Ecoacoustics using variational auto-encoding
K. A. Gibb, A. Eldridge, … I. J. A. Simpson·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2023
- A framework for the quantification of soundscape diversity using Hill numbers
T. Luypaert, A. S. Bueno, … T. Haugaasen·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2022
- Impact of Different Acoustic Components on EEG-based Auditory Attention Decoding in Noisy and Reverberant Conditions
Ali Aroudi, Bojana Mirkovic, … Simon Doclo·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Mar 7, 2019