Fishing for mammals: landscape-level monitoring of terrestrial and semi-aquatic communities using eDNA from lotic ecosystems
N. G. Sales, M. McKenzie, J. Drake, L. Harper, S. Browett, I. Coscia, O. Wangensteen, C. Baillie, E. Bryce, D. Dawson, E. Ochu, B. Hanfling, L. Lawson Handley, S. Mariani, X. Lambin, C. Sutherland, A. McDevitt
Abstract
O_LIEnvironmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has revolutionised biomonitoring in both marine and freshwater ecosystems. However, for semi-aquatic and terrestrial animals, the application of this technique remains relatively untested.\nC_LIO_LIWe first assess the efficiency of eDNA metabarcoding in detecting semi-aquatic and terrestrial mammals in natural lotic ecosystems in the UK by comparing sequence data recovered from water and sediment samples to the mammalian communities expected from historical data. Secondly, we evaluate the detection efficiency of eDNA samples compared to multiple conventional non-invasive survey methods (latrine surveys and camera trapping) using occupancy modelling.\nC_LIO_LIeDNA metabarcoding detected a large proportion of the expected mammalian community within each area. Common species in the areas were detected at the majority of sites. Several key species of conservation concern in the UK were detected by eDNA in areas where authenticated records do not currently exist, but potential false positives were also identified for several non-native species.\nC_LIO_LIWater-based eDNA samples provided comparable results to conventional survey methods in per unit of survey effort for three species (water vole, field vole, and red deer) using occupancy models. The comparison between survey effort to reach a detection probability of [≥]0.95 revealed that 3-6 water replicates would be equivalent to 3-5 latrine surveys and 5-30 weeks of single camera deployment, depending on the species.\nC_LIO_LISynthesis and Applications. eDNA metabarcoding represents an extremely promising tool for monitoring mammals, allowing for the detection of multiple species simultaneously, and provides comparable results to widely-used conventional survey methods. eDNA from freshwater systems delivers a terrestrial dividend by detecting both semi-aquatic and terrestrial mammalian communities, and provides a basis for future monitoring at a landscape level over larger spatial and temporal scales (i.e. long-term monitoring at national levels).\nC_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of pond water as a tool to survey conservation and management priority mammals
Lynsey R. Harper, Lori Lawson Handley, … Bernd Hänfling·Biological ConservationPeer-reviewed·Sep 3, 2019
- Mapping differences in mammalian distributions and diversity using environmental DNA from rivers
H. A. Broadhurst, L. M. Gregory, … A. McDevitt·bioRxiv·Apr 27, 2021
- Environmental DNA enables detection of terrestrial mammals from forest pond water
Masayuki Ushio, Hisato Fukuda, … Masaki Miya·bioRxiv·Aug 9, 2016
- Species ecology, behavior, and substrate type shape eDNA detection of mammals at savanna waterholes
Irmgard Sedlmayr, Janine R. Baxter, … Tamara Schenekar·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2026
- A comparison of eDNA to camera trapping for assessment of terrestrial mammal diversity
K. Leempoel, T. Hebert, E. A. Hadly·bioRxiv·May 10, 2019
- Unveiling vertebrate biodiversity in arid and semi-arid terrestrial ecosystems through eDNA metabarcoding at savanna waterholes
Tamara Schenekar, Janine R. Baxter, … Monica Mwale·Evolutionary ApplicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 29, 2026