Parallel EEG assessment of different sound predictability levels in tinnitus
Pia BrinkmanniD, Jana V. P. DevosiD, Jelle H. M. van der EerdeniD, Jasper V. SmitiD, Marcus L.F. JansseniD, Sonja A. KotziD, Michael SchwartzeiD
Abstract
ObjectiveTinnitus denotes perception of a non-environmental sound and might result from aberrant auditory prediction. Successful prediction of formal (e.g. type) and temporal sound characteristics facilitates the filtering of irrelevant information ("sensory gating", SG). Here, we explored if and how parallel manipulations of formal and temporal predictability affect sensory gating in persons with and without tinnitus. MethodsAge-, education- and sex-matched persons with and without tinnitus (N = 52) participated and listened to paired-tone "oddball" sequences, varying in formal (standard vs. deviant pitch) and temporal predictability (isochronous vs. random timing). EEG was recorded from 128 channels and data were analyzed by means of temporal spatial principal component analysis (tsPCA). ResultsSG was observed in P50- and N100-like activity (amplitude suppression for the 2nd tone in the pair) in both timing conditions and groups. Correspondingly, deviants elicited overall larger amplitudes than standards. However, only in persons without tinnitus N100-like activity in response to deviants was enhanced with isochronous relative to random timing. ConclusionsPersons with tinnitus do not benefit similarly as persons without tinnitus from temporally predictable context in deviance processing. SignificanceThe current results indicate altered temporal sensitivity and selective attention allocation in persons with tinnitus. Highlights- Persons with tinnitus display altered auditory predictions affecting the processing of unexpected auditory input - Position predictions did not differ between persons with tinnitus and without - Temporal predictability facilitated deviance processing for P50-like activity in persons with tinnitus and without
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.28
- Field percentile
- 48th percentile
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus) is characterised by stronger anticipatory auditory predictions
Marta Partyka, Gianpaolo Demarchi, … Nathan Weisz·bioRxiv·Dec 10, 2019
- What is a rhythm for the brain? The impact of contextual temporal variability on auditory perception
Pierre A Bonnet, Mathilde Bonnefond, Anne Kösem·Journal of CognitionPeer-reviewed·Jan 17, 2024
- Implicit temporal predictability enhances pitch discrimination sensitivity and biases the phase of delta oscillations in auditory cortex
Sophie K. Herbst, Jonas Obleser·bioRxiv·Aug 23, 2019
- Automatic and feature-specific (anticipatory) prediction-related neural activity in the human auditory system
Gianpaolo Demarchi, Gaëtan Sanchez, Nathan Weisz·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2019
- Cortical Activity Associated With Acute Development of Phantom Auditory Percepts via Unilateral Deprivation
Gregory Ginnan, Stefan Rampp, … Nadia Müller·bioRxiv·Jun 13, 2023
- Distinct yet complementary roles of temporal and spectral predictions in auditory detection
Johannes Wetekam, Chloe Dumeige, … Sophie K. Herbst·bioRxiv·Sep 21, 2026