bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Detecting CYP2C19 deletions from genotyping array signals using neural networks
Burak YelmeniD, Robin J. HofmeisteriD, Viido Kaur Lutsar, Marc FinianosiD, Benjamin C. Stone, Maarja JõelooiD, Kristi KrebsiD, Paula Ann Kivistik, Steven SmitiD, Mait MetspaluiD, Georgi HudjashoviD, Lili A. MilaniiD
Abstract
Since copy number variations (CNVs) in pharmacogenes can cause significant alterations in drug metabolism, their reliable detection is of high importance both for large-scale studies and personalized medicine. Whole-genome sequencing, and specifically long-read sequencing, is the gold standard for CNV detection. Despite increasing availability of these technologies, genotyping arrays are still widely used as cost-effective alternatives in biobank and clinical settings, yet calling CNVs based on array intensity signals is challenging due to low base pair resolution. In this work, we developed a neural network model, nnCNV, to predict deletions in the CYP2C19 pharmacogene region from array intensity signals. We compared our method to the most widely used algorithm, PennCNV, and demonstrated better performance reaching 100% accuracy in the test dataset. Furthermore, we predicted probe-by-probe CYP2C19 deletion coordinates for all Estonian Biobank samples using nnCNV and PennCNV, and validated these predictions using an identity-by-descent (IBD) sharing method, which also demonstrated superior nnCNV performance. For the deletion samples with conflicting PennCNV and nnCNV predictions, we performed PCR analysis for validation, which showed 97% precision for nnCNV compared to 23% for PennCNV. Finally, we assessed the gradient-based feature importance maps and showed that nnCNV utilizes signal intensity information not only from deletion probes, but also from probes in flanking regions. Our results demonstrate that long-range information, which cannot be utilized by hidden Markov models, can improve CNV calling.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Detecting rare copy number variants (CNVs) from Illumina genotyping arrays with the CamCNV pipeline: segmentation of z-scores improves detection and reliability.
Joe Dennis, Logan C. Walker, … Douglas F. Easton·Genetic EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 5, 2020
- CNValidatron: Accurate And Efficient Validation of PennCNV Calls Using Computer Vision
Simone Montalbano, G. Bragi Walters, … Andrés Ingason·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 23, 2026
- CNV-PG: a machine-learning framework for accurate copy number variation predicting and genotyping
Taifu Wang, Jinghua Sun, … Qing Zhou·bioRxiv·Apr 13, 2020
- CNV-Finder: Streamlining Copy Number Variation Discovery
Nicole Kuznetsov, Kensuke Daida, … Dan Vitale·DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC))Peer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Algorithmic improvements for discovery of germline copy number variants in next-generation sequencing data
Brendan D. O’Fallon, Jacob Durtschi, … Hunter D. Best·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 19, 2022
- Cross-validation of technologies for genotyping CYP2D6 and CYP2C19
Beatriz Carvalho Henriques, Amanda Buchner, … Katherine Jean Aitchison·Translational PsychiatryPeer-reviewed·Nov 22, 2021