henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint

Unique longitudinal contributions of sulcal interruptions to reading acquisition in children

Florence BouhaliiD, Jessica DuboisiD, Fumiko HoeftiD, Kevin S. WeineriD

PDFDOI

Abstract

A growing body of literature indicates strong associations between indentations of the cerebral cortex (i.e., sulci) and individual differences in cognitive performance. Interruptions, or gaps, of sulci (historically known as pli de passage) are particularly intriguing as previous work suggests that these interruptions have a causal effect on cognitive development. Here, we tested how the presence and morphology of sulcal interruptions in the left posterior occipitotemporal sulcus (pOTS) longitudinally impact the development of a culturally-acquired skill: reading. Forty-three children were successfully followed from age 5 in kindergarten, at the onset of literacy instruction, to ages 7 and 8 with assessments of cognitive, pre-literacy, and literacy skills, as well as MRI anatomical scans at ages 5 and 8. Crucially, we demonstrate that the presence of a left pOTS gap at 5 years is a robust and relatively specific longitudinal predictor of better future reading skills in children, with large observed benefits on reading behavior ranging from pseudoword decoding to reading comprehension. The effect of left pOTS interruptions on reading acquisition accumulated through time and showed strong predictive power relative to benchmark cognitive and familial predictors of reading ability and disability. Finally, we show that increased local U-fiber white matter connectivity associated with such sulcal interruptions possibly underlie these behavioral benefits, by providing a computational advantage. To our knowledge, this is the first quantitative evidence supporting a potential integrative gray-white matter mechanism underlying the cognitive benefits of macro-anatomical differences in sulcal morphology related to longitudinal improvements in a culturally-acquired skill.

Citations
3

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISYao '26Willbrand '22Ozernov‐Pal '22Yao '22Willbrand '23Meisler '24
77% semantic matchNeuroscience
Jewelia K. Yao, Jamie L. Mitchell, Alina Davison+1 more·bioRxiv·Apr 8, 2026