PLoS ONENeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
High frequency electrical stimulation induces a long-lasting enhancement of event-related potentials but does not change the perception elicited by intra-epidermal electrical stimuli delivered to the area of secondary mechanical hyperalgesia
José Alberto Biurrun ManresaiD, Ole Kæseler AnderseniD, André MourauxiD, Emanuel N. van den BroekeiD
Abstract
High frequency electrical stimulation (HFS) of the skin induces increased pinprick sensitivity in the surrounding unconditioned skin (secondary hyperalgesia). Moreover, it has been shown that brief high intensity CO2 laser stimuli, activating both A{delta}- and C-fiber nociceptors, are perceived as more intense when delivered in the area of secondary hyperalgesia. To investigate the contribution of A-fiber nociceptors to secondary hyperalgesia the present study assessed if the perception and brain responses elicited by low-intensity intra-epidermal electrical stimulation (IES), a method preferentially activating A{delta}-fiber nociceptors, are increased in the area of secondary hyperalgesia. HFS was delivered to one of the two forearms of seventeen healthy volunteers. Mechanical pinprick stimulation and IES were delivered at both arms before HFS (T0), 20 minutes after HFS (T1) and 45 minutes after HFS (T2). In all participants, HFS induced an increase in pinprick perception at the HFS-treated arm, adjacent to the site of HFS. This increase was significant at both T1 and T2. HFS did not affect the percept elicited by IES, but did enhance the magnitude of the N2 wave of IES-evoked brain potentials, both at T1 and at T2. HFS induced a long-lasting enhancement of the N2 wave elicited by IES in the area of secondary hyperalgesia, indicating that HFS enhances the responsiveness of the central nervous system to nociceptive inputs conveyed by AMH-II nociceptors. However, we found no evidence that HFS affects the perception elicited by IES, which may suggest that AMH-II nociceptors do not contribute to HFS-induced secondary hyperalgesia.
- Citations
- 31
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Field percentile
- top 12%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Interindividual variations in peak alpha frequency do not predict the magnitude or extent of secondary hyperalgesia induced by high-frequency stimulation
Louisien Lebrun, Gloria Ricci, … André Mouraux·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2025
- Temporal changes in mechanical pin prick sensitivity following high frequency induced sensitisation of central nociceptive pathways: a test re-test reliability study
Samuel Mugglestone, Giorgio Ganis, Sam Hughes·Journal of PainPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2026
- A back-translational study of descending interactions with central mechanisms of hyperalgesia induced by high frequency stimulation in rat and human
Ryan Patel, Joseph L Taylor, … Kirsty Bannister·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2022
- Central sensitization increases the pupil dilation elicited by mechanical pinprick stimulation
Emanuel N. van den Broeke, D.M. Hartgerink, … André Mouraux·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 20, 2019
- Nociceptive-evoked electroencephalography can predict inter-individual differences in high frequency induced sensitisation of central nociceptive pathways: A test-retest reliability study
Samuel Mugglestone, Sam W Hughes, Giorgio Ganis·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2026
- Intense and sustained pain reduces cortical responses to auditory stimuli: implications for the interpretation of Heterotopic Noxious Conditioning Stimulation in humans
Diana M. E. Torta, Fabricio Ariel Jure, … José Alberto Biurrun Manresa·European Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 14, 2019