bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Unsupervised encoding selection through ensemble pruning for biomedical classification
- Citations
- 0
Abstract
BackgroundOwing to the rising levels of multi-resistant pathogens, antimicrobial peptides, an alternative strategy to classic antibiotics, got more attention. A crucial part is thereby the costly identification and validation. With the ever-growing amount of annotated peptides, researchers leverage artificial intelligence to circumvent the cumbersome, wet-lab-based identification and automate the detection of promising candidates. However, the prediction of a peptides function is not limited to antimicrobial efficiency. To date, multiple studies successfully classified additional properties, e.g., antiviral or cell-penetrating effects. In this light, ensemble classifiers are employed aiming to further improve the prediction. Although we recently presented a workflow to significantly diminish the initial encoding choice, an entire unsupervised encoding selection, considering various machine learning models, is still lacking. ResultsWe developed a workflow, automatically selecting encodings and generating classifier ensembles by employing sophisticated pruning methods. We observed that the Pareto frontier pruning is a good method to create encoding ensembles for the datasets at hand. In addition, encodings combined with the Decision Tree classifier as the base model are often superior. However, our results also demonstrate that none of the ensemble building techniques is outstanding for all datasets. ConclusionThe workflow conducts multiple pruning methods to evaluate ensemble classifiers composed from a wide range of peptide encodings and base models. Consequently, researchers can use the workflow for unsupervised encoding selection and ensemble creation. Ultimately, the extensible workflow can be used as a plugin for the PEPTIDE REACToR, further establishing it as a versatile tool in the domain.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Classification of bioactive peptides: a comparative analysis of models and encodings
Edoardo Bizzotto, Guido Zampieri, … Stefano Campanaro·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2023
- RulePep: Interpretable ESM-Guided Neural-Symbolic Peptide Classification
Farzad Midjani, Reza Ghelich, … Heewook Lee·bioRxiv·Jul 6, 2026
- APDeeM: A machine Learning strategy towards Effective Peptide Vaccine Candidates Identification against Different Types of Viruses
Mohammad Uzzal Hossain, Md. Romzan Alom, … M. Salimullah·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2025
- Pep-PU-GAN: Positive-Unlabeled Adversarial Learning for Peptide Function Prediction
Farzad Midjani, Samaneh Hashemi, … Bardia Khosravi·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2026
- AutoPeptideML: A study on how to build more trustworthy peptide bioactivity predictors
Raúl Fernández-Díaz, Rodrigo Cossio-Pérez, … Denis C. Shields·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2024
- SAMP: Identifying Antimicrobial Peptides by an Ensemble Learning Model Based on Proportionalized Split Amino Acid Composition
Junxi Feng, Mengtao Sun, … Shibiao Wan·Briefings in Functional GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2024