Classification of bioactive peptides: a comparative analysis of models and encodings
Edoardo BizzottoiD, Guido ZampieriiD, Laura TreuiD, Pasquale FilanninoiD, Raffaella Di CagnoiD, Stefano CampanaroiD
Abstract
Bioactive peptides are short amino acid chains possessing biological activity and exerting specific physiological effects relevant to human health, which are increasingly produced through fermentation due to their therapeutic roles. One of the main open problems related to biopeptides remains the determination of their functional potential, which still mainly relies on time-consuming in vivo tests. While bioinformatic tools for the identification of bioactive peptides are available, they are focused on specific functional classes and have not been systematically tested on realistic settings. To tackle this problem, bioactive peptide sequences and functions were collected from a variety of databases to generate a comprehensive collection of bioactive peptides from microbial fermentation. This collection was organized into nine functional classes including some previously studied and some newly defined such as immunomodulatory, opioid and cardiovascular peptides. Upon assessing their native sequence properties, four alternative encoding methods were tested in combination with a multitude of machine learning algorithms, from basic classifiers like logistic regression to advanced algorithms like BERT. By testing a total set of 171 models, it was found that, while some functions are intrinsically easier to detect, no single combination of classifiers and encoders worked universally well for all the classes. For this reason, we unified all the best individual models for each class and generated CICERON (Classification of bIoaCtive pEptides fRom micrObial fermeNtation), a classification tool for the functional classification of peptides. State-of-the-art classifiers were found to underperform on our benchmark dataset compared to the models included in CICERON. Altogether, our work provides a tool for real-world peptide classification and can serve as a benchmark for future model development.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Unsupervised encoding selection through ensemble pruning for biomedical classification
Sebastian Spänig, Alexander Michel, Dominik Heider·bioRxiv·Feb 6, 2022
- Peptipedia v2.0: A peptide sequence database and user-friendly web platform. A major update
Gabriel Cabas-Mora, Anamaria Sanchez–Daza, … David Medina-Ortiz·DatabasePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Leveraging publicly available datasets and machine learning approaches for predicting the health benefits of fermented foods
Elizabeth McDaniel, Chantle R. Edillor, … Rachel J. Dutton·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2026
- Sequence-Based Therapeutic Peptide Classification with Augmented Negative Sampling
Roman Ellerbrock, Alessio Valentini, … Michael Romanovich Perelshtein·bioRxiv·Jun 11, 2026
- RulePep: Interpretable ESM-Guided Neural-Symbolic Peptide Classification
Farzad Midjani, Reza Ghelich, … Heewook Lee·bioRxiv·Jul 6, 2026
- A distribution-aware and functionally relevant novel framework for generation and discovery of bioactive peptides
Rachit Abhigyan, Vikas Sood, … Baljeet Kaur·bioRxiv·Aug 9, 2026