Spatiotemporal dynamics of lexical and morphosyntactic planning during language production revealed by magnetoencephalography
Yi WeiiD, L. Robert SlevciD, Christian J. BrodbeckiD, Yasmeen Faroqi-shah AiD
Abstract
Fluent sentence production relies on the precise and timely coordination of lexical retrieval, morphosyntactic planning, and motor execution. While a left-dominant fronto-parieto-temporal network has been identified for these subcomponents of sentence production, less is known about the time course of engagement of these regions. One key issue is the extent to which the engagement of neural regions is sequential. The aim of the present study was to delineate spatiotemporal patterns of subcomponents of sentence production, namely lexical retrieval, inflection, and constituent assembly, and identify any lexical category differences (nouns versus verbs) in these processes. Magnetoencephalographic (MEG) responses were measured using a novel picture-icon paradigm in which verbal responses were elicited using object or action pictures followed by an icon that indicated the subcomponent sentence processes: lexical access, inflection (plurals for nouns, tense for verbs), and constituent assembly (adjective + object or pronoun + action). MEG data from twenty native English-speaking right-handed neurotypical adults was analysed for both stimulus-locked and response-locked timelines. We focused on responses in left hemisphere speech-language regions of interest (ROI): precentral gyrus (M1), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), anterior temporal lobe (ATL), posterior temporal lobe (PTL), and inferior parietal lobe (IPL). The results revealed the following: 1) early and largely simultaneous engagement of all ROIs for lexical access; 2) compared to noun lexical access, verb lexical access is associated with a larger neural response across multiple language ROIs; 3) morphosyntactic planning engaged all ROIs, showing commonalities as well as unique patterns for each morphosyntactic condition; 4) noun morphosyntax vs noun lexical access showed a larger response across multiple ROIs compared to verb morphosyntax vs verb lexical access; 5) M1 was coactivated with other ROIs early in the planning stage, suggesting simultaneity of language and motor planning. The findings support a network model of language in which the syntactic, semantic, and phonological properties of a word are bound to a single anatomically distributed representation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Speaking in the brain: The interaction between words and syntax in producing sentences
Atsuko Takashima, Agnieszka E. Konopka, … Kirsten Weber·bioRxiv·Jul 9, 2019
- Spectro-temporal neural dynamics during sentence completion
Tim Coolen, Alexandru Mihai Dumitrescu, … Xavier De Tiège·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2021
- A Unified Neural Timecourse for Words, Phrases, and Sentences: MEG Evidence from Parallel Presentation
Nigel Flower, Liina Pylkkänen A·bioRxiv·Nov 17, 2025
- Precision fMRI reveals that the language-selective network supports both phrase-structure building and lexical access during language production
Jennifer Hu, Hannah Small, … Evelina G. Fedorenko·Cerebral CortexPeer-reviewed·Aug 24, 2022
- Lexical Access in Comprehension vs. Production: Spatiotemporal Localization of Semantic Facilitation and Interference
Julien Dirani, Liina Pylkkänen A·bioRxiv·Oct 24, 2018
- Decoding words during sentence production: Syntactic role encoding and structure-dependent dynamics revealed by ECoG
Adam Milton Morgan, Orrin Devinsky, … Adeen Flinker·Communications PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Jun 3, 2025