Sign in
GenomicsG3 Genes Genomes Genetics
Peer-reviewed journal article

Genomic prediction of autotetraploids; influence of relationship matrices, allele dosage, and continuous genotyping calls in phenotype prediction

Ivone de Bem OliveiraiD, Márcio F. R. ResendeiD, Luís Felipe V. FerrãoiD, Rodrigo Rampazo AmadeuiD, Jeffrey B. EndelmaniD, Matias KirstiD, Alexandre Siqueira Guedes CoelhoiD, Patricio MuńoziD

Abstract

Estimation of allele dosage in autopolyploids is challenging and current methods often result in the misclassification of genotypes. Here we propose and compare the use of next generation sequencing read depth as continuous parameterization for autotetraploid genomic prediction of breeding values, using blueberry (Vaccinium corybosum spp.) as a model. Additionally, we investigated the influence of different sources of information to build relationship matrices in phenotype prediction; no relationship, pedigree, and genomic information, considering either diploid or tetraploid parameterizations. A real breeding population composed of 1,847 individuals was phenotyped for eight yield and fruit quality traits over two years. Analyses were based on extensive pedigree (since 1908) and high-density marker data (86K markers). Our results show that marker-based matrices can yield significantly better prediction than pedigree for most of the traits, based on model fitting and expected genetic gain. Continuous genotypic based models performed as well as the current best models and presented a significantly better goodness-of-fit for all traits analyzed. This approach also reduces the computational time required for marker calling and avoids problems associated with misclassification of genotypic classes when assigning dosage in polyploid species. Accuracies are encouraging for application of genomic selection (GS) for blueberry breeding. Conservatively, GS could reduce the time for cultivar release by three years. GS could increase the genetic gain per cycle by 86% on average when compared to phenotypic selection, and 32% when compared with pedigree-based selection.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISFerrão '21Batista '21Gemenet '20Aono '22Jung '25Feldmann '21
81% semantic matchGenomics
Luís Felipe V. Ferrão, Rodrigo Rampazo Amadeu, Juliana Benevenuto+2 more·Frontiers in Plant Science·Jun 14, 2021· 64 citations