ProtAug: An Empirical Investigation of pLM-Guided Data Augmentation for Protein Sequence Prediction Tasks

Abstract

Protein language models (pLMs) offer great potential for protein sequence analysis, yet the scarcity of labeled data often limits their effectiveness in fine-tuning. Data augmentation is a promising remedy, but systematic evaluation of augmentation strategies for protein sequences remains limited, and the conditions under which augmentation confers downstream benefits are not well understood. In this paper, we systematically investigate pLM-guided substitution-based augmentation across seven protein prediction tasks. We propose ProtAug, a framework that leverages encoder-based (ESM-2) and autoregressive (ProtGPT2) pLMs to generate augmented sequences with user-controlled variation levels. Our investigation focuses on four questions: (Q1) whether pLM-synthesized sequences preserve more original signals than simpler methods, (Q2) to what extent augmentation improves prediction performance, (Q3) how variation levels affect downstream accuracy across tasks and models, and (Q4) whether biological plausibility is a necessary condition for achieving improvement. Our experimental results show that: (1) ProtAug Esm generally preserves motifs and structural similarity better than simple substitution, often comparable to homology retrieval; (2) augmentation yields consistent but task-dependent improvements, with ProtAug Esm achieving the best or second-best performance in 5 out of 7 tasks at 10% variation; (3) low-to-moderate variation levels (2-30%) perform best overall, although high-variation augmentation can benefit certain structure-related tasks; (4) the necessity of biological plausibility is task- and variation-dependent--while semantic preservation correlates with performance at low-to-moderate variation levels, improved generalization at high variation levels suggests that regularization effects, rather than label preservation, can also drive performance gains.