Sign in
BioinformaticsNature Communications
Peer-reviewed journal article

Fine-tuning protein language models boosts predictions across diverse tasks

Robert SchmirleriD, Michael HeinzingeriD, Burkhard RostiD

Abstract

Prediction methods inputting embeddings from protein Language Models (pLMs) have reached or even surpassed state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on many protein prediction tasks. In natural language processing (NLP) fine-tuning large Language Models (LLMs) has become the de facto standard. In contrast, most pLM-based protein predictions do not back-propagate to the pLM. Here, we compared the fine-tuning of three SOTA pLMs (ESM2, ProtT5, Ankh) on eight different tasks. Two results stood out. Firstly, task-specific supervised fine-tuning almost always improved downstream predictions. Secondly, parameter-efficient fine-tuning could reach similar improvements consuming substantially fewer resources at up to 4.5-fold acceleration of training over fine-tuning full models. Our results suggested to always try fine-tuning, in particular for problems with small datasets, such as for fitness landscape predictions of a single protein. For ease of adaptability, we provided easy-to-use notebooks to fine-tune all models used during this work for per-protein (pooling) and per-residue prediction tasks at https://github.com/RSchmirler/data-repo_plm-finetune-eval.

PDFDOICode

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
228
FWCI
30.92
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISHawkins‐Hoo '24Gordon '24Ghani '26Fournier '24Sledzieski '24Yang '23
82% semantic matchBioinformatics
Alex Hawkins‐Hooker, Shikha Surana, Jack Simons+3 more·bioRxiv·May 28, 2024· 6 citations