Benefits and Limits of Phasing Alleles for Network Inference of Allopolyploid Complexes
G. P. Tiley, A. A. Crowl, P. S. Manos, E. B. Sessa, C. Solis-Lemus, A. D. Yoder, J. G. Burleigh
Abstract
Accurately reconstructing the reticulate histories of polyploids remains a central challenge for understanding plant evolution. Although phylogenetic networks can provide insights into relationships among polyploid lineages, inferring networks may be hindered by the complexities of homology determination in polyploid taxa. We use simulations to show that phasing alleles from allopolyploid individuals can improve phylogenetic network inference under the multispecies coalescent by obtaining the true network with fewer loci compared to haplotype consensus sequences or sequences with heterozygous bases represented as ambiguity codes. Phased allelic data can also improve divergence time estimates for networks, which is helpful for evaluating allopolyploid speciation hypotheses and proposing mechanisms of speciation. To achieve these outcomes in empirical data, we present a novel pipeline that leverages a recently developed phasing algorithm to reliably phase alleles from polyploids. This pipeline is especially appropriate for target enrichment data, where depth of coverage is typically high enough to phase entire loci. We provide an empirical example in the North American Dryopteris fern complex that demonstrates insights from phased data as well as the challenges of network inference. We establish that our pipeline (PATE: Phased Alleles from Target Enrichment data) is capable of recovering a high proportion of phased loci from both diploids and polyploids. These data may improve network estimates compared to using haplotype consensus assemblies by accurately inferring the direction of gene flow, but statistical non-identifiability of phylogenetic networks poses a barrier to inferring the evolutionary history of reticulate complexes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Maximum Parsimony Inference of Phylogenetic Networks in the Presence of Polyploid Complexes
Z. Yan, Z. Cao, … L. Nakhleh·bioRxiv·Sep 28, 2020
- Bayesian Phylogenetic Analysis For Diploid And Allotetraploid Species Networks
Graham Jones·bioRxiv·Apr 21, 2017
- DIMPLE: A Tree-Guided Divide-and-Conquer Framework for ILS-Aware Phylogenetic Network Inference on Large-Scale Data
Ziyun Guang, Nicolae Sapoval, … Luay K. Nakhleh·bioRxiv·Oct 18, 2026
- Dense Sampling of Taxa and Genomes Untangles the Phylogenetic Backbone of a Non-model Plant Lineage Rife with Deep Hybridization and Allopolyploidy
- Inferring Phylogenetic Networks Using PhyloNet
D. Wen, Y. Yun, … L. Nakhleh·bioRxiv·Dec 22, 2017
- An explicit birth-death-reticulation model for studying the diversification of phylogenetic networks
Michael R. May, Carl J. Rothfels·bioRxiv·Sep 17, 2026