PROBE: A Neurophysiology-Informed Bayesian Optimization Framework for Adaptive TMS Motor Hotspot Mapping, Algorithm Design and Monte Carlo Evaluation
Negar NamdariD, Isabella AriasiD, Owen TexteriD, Elisa KallioniemiiD
Abstract
BackgroundAccurate primary motor cortex (M1) hotspot identification is a prerequisite for reliable transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocols, yet conventional grid search is stimulation-intensive and operator-dependent. Existing Bayesian optimization (BO) implementations, including BOOST and 3D-BOOST, do not model within-session neurophysiological variability. MethodsWe present PROBE (Probabilistic Response-guided Optimization for Brain Exploration), a closed-loop BO framework for three-parameter TMS hotspot mapping over coil position (X, Y) and orientation ({theta}), with five innovations targeting cortical excitability drift, amplitude-dependent noise, transient artifacts, sub-threshold MEP integration (10 {micro}V floor), and cross-subject Gaussian process (GP) prior warm-starting. These were evaluated alone and in combination with amplitude-weighted center-of-gravity (CoG) convergence and estimation across 18 configurations in a Monte Carlo simulation (30 subjects, 3 repetitions each). ResultsAlgorithm configuration significantly affected all outcomes (Friedman tests, all p < 0.001, Kendalls W = 0.50-0.65). MultiFid_CoG_10uV achieved the lowest median XY error (1.14 [0.62-2.12] mm; 50.9 {+/-} 6.2 stimuli; 96.7% convergence), a 68.2% error reduction and 41.5% stimulus reduction relative to grid Search (3.58 [2.66-5.12] mm; 87 stimuli). CoG estimation significantly reduced XY error relative to peak-response selection in 10 of 11 non-CoG configurations (largest gain: MultiFid, 58.7%; adjusted p < 0.001). ConclusionsNeurophysiology-informed BO improved simulated performance under the specified model, extending the 3-DOF approach of Grano et al. (2025) with explicit noise modeling and CoG-based convergence. MultiFid_CoG_10uV and DeltaBO_CoG are selected as candidates for prospective validation in a prospective triple-blind human study.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Efficient Gaussian Process-based Motor Hotspot Hunting with Concurrent Optimization of TMS Coil Location and Orientation
Dirk Schultheiss, Zsolt Turi, … Andreas Vlachos·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 17, 2026
- Fast and standardized motor-hotspot determination with automated TMS mapping
Ida Granö, Olli‐Pekka Kahilakoski, … Tuomas P. Mutanen·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2025
- Automated search of stimulation targets with closed-loop transcranial magnetic stimulation
A. E. Tervo, J. Metsomaa, … R. J. Ilmoniemi·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2020
- Bayesian Optimization of Neurostimulation (BOONStim)
Lindsay D. Oliver, Jerrold Jeyachandra, … Aristotle N. Voineskos·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Jan 27, 2025
- Adaptive Bayesian localization of motor representation areas
Mikael Laine, Tuomas P. Mutanen, … Risto Juhani Ilmoniemi·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2026
- A novel approach to localize cortical TMS effects
Konstantin Weise, Ole Numssen, … Thomas R. Knösche·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Dec 23, 2019