Journal of Cognitive NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Electrophysiological indices of distractor processing in visual search are shaped by target expectations.
Abstract
Although in many cases salient stimuli capture attention involuntarily, it has been proposed recently that under certain conditions the bottom-up signal generated by such stimuli can be proactively suppressed. In support of this signal suppression hypothesis, ERP studies have demonstrated that salient stimuli that do not capture attention elicit a distractor positivity (PD), a putative neural index of suppression. At the same time, it is becoming increasingly clear that regularities across preceding search episodes have a large influence on attentional selection. Yet to date, studies in support of the signal suppression hypothesis have largely ignored the role of selection history on the processing of distractors. The current study addressed this issue by examining how electrophysiological markers of attentional selection (N2pc) and suppression (PD) elicited by targets and distractors respectively were modulated when the search target randomly varied instead of being fixed across trials. Results showed that while target selection was unaffected by this manipulation, both in terms of manual response times, as well as in terms of the N2pc component, the PD component was reliably attenuated when the target features varied randomly across trials. This result demonstrates that the distractor PD, which is typically considered the marker of selective distractor processing cannot unequivocally be attributed to suppression only, as it also, at least in part, reflects the upweighting of target features.
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 25
- FWCI
- 2.27
- Field percentile
- top 11%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Spatially guided distractor suppression during visual search
Tobias Feldmann‐Wüstefeld, Marina Weinberger, Edward Awh·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Mar 2, 2021
- Distractor suppression does and does not depend on pre-distractor alpha-band activity
Zach V. Redding, Ian C. Fiebelkorn·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·May 10, 2024
- Auditory Attention Implements Complementary but Independent Cortical Mechanisms of Enhancement and Suppression
Max Schulz, Christopher Gundlach, … Malte Wöstmann·bioRxiv·Apr 30, 2026
- Learning what is irrelevant or relevant: Expectations facilitate distractor inhibition and target facilitation through distinct neural mechanisms
Dirk van Moorselaar, Heleen A. Slagter·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 3, 2019
- Anticipatory distractor suppression elicited by statistical regularities in visual search
Benchi Wang, Joram van Driel, … Jan Theeuwes·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 10, 2019
- Prefrontal control of visual distraction
Joshua D. Cosman, Kaleb A. Lowe, … Jeffrey D. Schall·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 18, 2018