henhaobio
Sign in

Journal of Cognitive NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Electrophysiological indices of distractor processing in visual search are shaped by target expectations.

Dirk van MoorselaariD, Changrun HuangiD, Jan TheeuwesiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Although in many cases salient stimuli capture attention involuntarily, it has been proposed recently that under certain conditions the bottom-up signal generated by such stimuli can be proactively suppressed. In support of this signal suppression hypothesis, ERP studies have demonstrated that salient stimuli that do not capture attention elicit a distractor positivity (PD), a putative neural index of suppression. At the same time, it is becoming increasingly clear that regularities across preceding search episodes have a large influence on attentional selection. Yet to date, studies in support of the signal suppression hypothesis have largely ignored the role of selection history on the processing of distractors. The current study addressed this issue by examining how electrophysiological markers of attentional selection (N2pc) and suppression (PD) elicited by targets and distractors respectively were modulated when the search target randomly varied instead of being fixed across trials. Results showed that while target selection was unaffected by this manipulation, both in terms of manual response times, as well as in terms of the N2pc component, the PD component was reliably attenuated when the target features varied randomly across trials. This result demonstrates that the distractor PD, which is typically considered the marker of selective distractor processing cannot unequivocally be attributed to suppression only, as it also, at least in part, reflects the upweighting of target features.

Citations
25
FWCI
2.27
Field percentile
top 11%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISFeldmann‐Wü '21Redding '24Schulz '26Moorselaar '19Wang '19Cosman '18
81% semantic matchNeuroscience
Tobias Feldmann‐Wüstefeld, Marina Weinberger, Edward Awh·Journal of Neuroscience·Mar 2, 2021· 51 citations