Sign in
NeuroscienceCurrent Biology
Peer-reviewed journal article

Fast prediction in marmoset reach-to-grasp movements for dynamic prey

Luke H. ShawiD, Kuan Hong WangiD, Jude F. MitchelliD

Abstract

Primates have evolved sophisticated visually guided reaching behaviors for interacting with dynamic objects, such as insects during foraging(P. S. Archambault, Ferrari-Toniolo, & Battaglia-Mayer, 2011; Bicca-Marques, 1999; Ngo et al., 2022; Smith & Smith, 2013; Sustaita et al., 2013). Reaching control in dynamic natural conditions requires active prediction of the targets future position to compensate for visuo-motor processing delays and enhance online movement adjustments(Catania, 2009; Desmurget & Grafton, 2000; Fujioka, Aihara, Sumiya, Aihara, & Hiryu, 2016; Merchant & Georgopoulos, 2006; Mischiati et al., 2015; R. Shadmehr, Smith, & Krakauer, 2010; Wolpert & Kawato, 1998). Past reaching research in non-human primates mainly focused on seated subjects engaged in repeated ballistic arm movements to either stationary targets, or targets that instantaneously change position during the movement(Philippe S. Archambault, Caminiti, & Battaglia-Mayer, 2009; Battaglia-Mayer et al., 2013; Dickey, Amit, & Hatsopoulos, 2013; Georgopoulos, Kalaska, Caminiti, & Massey, 1983; Georgopoulos, Kalaska, & Massey, 1981). However, those approaches impose task constraints that limit the natural dynamics of reaching. A recent field study in marmoset monkeys highlights predictive aspects of visually-guided reaching during insect prey capture among wild marmoset monkeys(Ngo et al., 2022). To examine the complementary dynamics of similar natural behavior within a laboratory context we developed an ecologically motivated unrestrained reach-to-grasp task involving live crickets. We used multiple high-speed video cameras to capture the movements of marmosets and crickets stereoscopically and applied machine vision algorithms for marker-free object and hand tracking. Contrary to estimates under traditional constrained reaching paradigms, we find that reaching for dynamic targets can operate at incredibly short visuo-motor delays around 80 milliseconds, rivaling the speeds that are typical of the oculomotor systems during closed-loop visual pursuit(Cloherty, Yates, Graf, DeAngelis, & Mitchell, 2020). Multivariate linear regression modeling of the kinematic relationships between the hand and cricket velocity revealed that predictions of the expected future location can compensate for visuo-motor delays during fast reaching. These results suggest a critical role of visual prediction facilitating online movement adjustments for dynamic prey.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
23
FWCI
3.44
Field percentile
top 7%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.