Sign in
BioengineeringJournal of Orthopaedic Research®
Peer-reviewed journal article

Acoustic Prediction and Biomechanical Validation of Primary Stability in Uncemented Short-Stem Hip Prostheses: An In Vitro Study

Alexander JahnkeiD, Simon SchreynemackersiD, Ahmed Tawous, Swantje Petersen, Samar Hamad, Markus RickertiD, Bernd Alexander IshaqueiD

Abstract

BackgroundIn uncemented hip arthroplasty, achieving sufficient primary stability is essential for long-term implant success. However, objective intraoperative assessment of fixation quality remains challenging. Acoustic analysis of stem impaction sounds offers a promising tool for real-time evaluation, but its diagnostic accuracy and biomechanical correlation require further validation. MethodsTwelve formalin-fixed human femora were implanted with cementless Metha(R) short stems under three predefined anchorage conditions: loose, optimal (fit), and fracture-inducing press-fit. Impaction sounds were recorded using calibrated microphones and processed via frequency-domain analysis. Relative micromotions were quantified under torsional loading to biomechanically assess primary stability. ResultsSpectral markers reliably differentiated between anchorage states. The transition from loose to fit showed minimal spectral change, while fit-to-fracture was characterized by a significant increase in low-frequency energy (15 kHz). These acoustic signatures closely correlated with biomechanically measured micromotions, which showed a distinct hierarchy: fracture < fit < loose. Cluster permutation analysis confirmed statistically significant differences, particularly in the fracture group. ConclusionThis in vitro study demonstrates that frequency-based acoustic analysis can distinguish between stable, insufficient, and over-press-fit conditions during stem implantation. The findings support the potential of intraoperative acoustic monitoring as a real-time, objective tool to enhance implant safety and detect cortical compromise before it becomes clinically apparent.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
48th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.