Genome biologyGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Robust normalization and transformation techniques for constructing gene coexpression networks from RNA-seq data
Abstract
BackgroundConstructing gene coexpression networks is a powerful approach for analyzing high-throughput gene expression data towards module identification, gene function prediction, and disease-gene prioritization. While optimal workflows for constructing coexpression networks - including good choices for data pre-processing, normalization, and network transformation - have been developed for microarray-based expression data, such well-tested choices do not exist for RNA-seq data. Almost all studies that compare data processing/normalization methods for RNA-seq focus on the end goal of determining differential gene expression. ResultsHere, we present a comprehensive benchmarking and analysis of 30 different workflows, each with a unique set of normalization and network transformation methods, for constructing coexpression networks from RNA-seq datasets. We tested these workflows on both large, homogenous datasets (Genotype-Tissue Expression project) and small, heterogeneous datasets from various labs (submitted to the Sequence Read Archive). We analyzed the workflows in terms of aggregate performance, individual method choices, and the impact of multiple dataset experimental factors. Our results demonstrate that between-sample normalization has the biggest impact, with trimmed mean of M-values or upper quartile normalization producing networks that most accurately recapitulate known tissue-naive and tissue-specific gene functional relationships. ConclusionsBased on this work, we provide concrete recommendations on robust procedures for building an accurate coexpression network from an RNA-seq dataset. In addition, researchers can examine all the results in great detail at https://krishnanlab.github.io/norm_for_RNAseq_coexp to make appropriate choices for coexpression analysis based on the experimental factors of their RNA-seq dataset.
- Citations
- 108
- FWCI
- 7.67
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evaluation of critical data processing steps for reliable prediction of gene co-expression from large collections of RNA-seq data
Alexis Vandenbon·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2022
- Adjustment of spurious correlations in co-expression measurements from RNA-Sequencing data
Ping‐Han Hsieh, Camila M. Lopes‐Ramos, … Marieke L. Kuijjer·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2023
- Co-expression analysis is biased by a mean-correlation relationship
Yi Wang, Stephanie C. Hicks, Kasper D. Hansen·bioRxiv·Feb 13, 2020
- Transformation and model choice for RNA-seq co-expression analysis
Andréa Rau, Cathy Maugis-Rabusseau·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 21, 2016
- Comparison of confound adjustment methods in the construction of gene co-expression networks
Alanna C. Cote, Hannah E. Young, Laura M. Huckins·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 3, 2022
- Constructing Gene Co-functional and Co-regulatory Networks from Public Transcriptomes using Condition-Specific Ensemble Co-expression
Peng Ken Lim, Ruoxi Wang, … Marek Mutwil·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 30, 2026