bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Genetic determinism and inheritance of differential DNA methylation profiles across three successive generations in quail.
Stacy RousseiD, Sophie LerouxiD, Remi SeraphiniD, David GourichoniD, Marta GòdiaiD, Ole MadseniD, Sandrine LagarrigueiD, Tatiana ZerjaliD, Frédérique Pitel AiD, Sonia E EynardiD
Abstract
Environmental exposures can induce epigenetic modifications that persist across generations, potentially contributing to the transmission of environmentally-induced phenotypes. However, the extent to which such persistence of molecular changes are maintained independently of genetic mechanisms remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the evolution and genetic determinism of DNA methylation (DNAm) variation across three successive generations of Japanese quails (G0 to G2) belonging to two epilines, defined according to whether their female ancestor had received genistein supplementation (epi+) or not (epi-). Using reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS), we characterised CpG methylation patterns and identified differentially methylated cytosines (DMCs) and regions (DMRs) between control and genistein-supplemented epilines. Out of 112,745 CpG sites analysed, no DMCs or DMRs were detected between epilines in the first generation following exposure (G0), whereas 621 DMCs (36 DMRs) were identified in G1, and 1,381 DMCs (101 DMRs) in G2. Despite this progressive increase of differential methylation sites, mean differences in methylation rate between epilines were globally small. Similarly, genome-wide genetic differentiation between epilines was very limited. Overall, SNP-based heritability of DNA methylation was 0.19 indicating that genetic variation accounted for only a small part of the global variation of DNAm levels. By contrast, DNAm at differentially methylated CpG sites was extensively under genetic control, with a mean SNP-based heritability > 0.5, and meQTL analysis further identified significant associations between SNPs and methylation levels. Together, these results indicate that local DNAm differentiation in quail is under substantial genetic regulation, while the limited genetic differentiation between groups suggests that genetic variation alone can not fully explain the progressive accumulation of methylation differences following an ancestral exposure to genistein. These results support DNAm as a plausible molecular candidate mechanism in the multigenerational response to environmental exposure and highlight the complex interplay between genetic and epigenetic regulations in the inheritance of phenotypes.
- organism: non-human primate
- assay: DNA methylation
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Transmission of an environmental modification in quails across three generations: changes in the contribution to phenotypic variability
Stacy Rousse, Sophie Leroux, … Sonia E Eynard·Genetics Selection EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Aug 10, 2026
- Environmentally-induced DNA methylation is inherited across generations in an aquatic keystone species (Daphnia magna)
N. Feiner, R. Radersma, … T. Uller·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2021
- Sex-specific multigenerational epigenetic responses to real-world chemical mixture exposure in an outbred sheep model
Oliver George Hargreaves, Wing Yee Kwong, … Kevin D. Sinclair·bioRxiv·Apr 10, 2026
- Heritability of DNA methylation in threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus)
J. Hu, S. J. S. Wuitchik, … R. D. H. Barrett·bioRxiv·Nov 26, 2020
- Epigenetic inheritance mediates phenotypic diversity in natural populations
Z. Shahzad, J. D. Moore, … D. Zilberman·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2021
- Inferences from epigenetic information in an ecological context: a case study of early-life environmental effects on DNA methylation in zebra finches
Marianthi Tangili, Per Jakob Palsbøll, Simon Verhulst·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jul 23, 2026