bioRxivAnimal Behavior & CognitionPreprint
Public perception of dog emotional and motivational states in videos: A cross-sectional analysis
Lauren E. SametiD, Jana MuschinskiiD, Naomi D. HarveyiD, Kassandra GiragosianiD, Melissa M. UpjohniD, Jane Murray, Sara C. Owczarczak‐GarsteckaiD
- Citations
- 0
Abstract
Recognition and interpretation of dogs emotional and motivational states from visual behavioural signs are important for public safety and dog welfare. This study used an online survey to explore the ability of members of the public (n = 4,133) to recognise the underlying emotional or motivational states of dogs in silent videos (n=30). Participants scored each video for nine pre-determined emotional and motivational states on a scale from 0 to 15 and rated the relative difficulty of scoring each video. Participants could also select "I am uncertain" for individual states which translated to missing values. Public scores were compared with those of eleven dog behaviour experts. The states "nervous/anxious", "stressed", "relaxed", "comfortable", "playful", "interested/curious", "excited", and "frustrated" showed high inter-expert agreement and were used in further analysis. "Boredom" was removed due to low inter-expert agreement. Principal components and cluster analyses on both datasets were used to collapse categories into two dimensions, identify groupings and compare overall perception. Results indicate similarity in perception of underlying states between public and experts. Correlation between expert difficulty rating, and both inter-expert agreement and public accuracy, indicates that experts effectively assessed the relative difficulty of determining underlying state. Members of the public perceived playful, excited, and curious dogs as easier to interpret than anxious and stressed dogs; however, this was not reflected in how accurately they scored videos (i.e., how different a participants scores were from the expert scores) and instead was reflected by how likely a participant was to score a video in full, rather than selecting that they were "uncertain" in response to any of the listed states. Findings of this study inform human behaviour change interventions to improve public interpretation of dog emotional and motivational states.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Free-ranging dogs are capable of comprehending complex human pointing cues.
D. Bhattacharjee, S. Mandal, … A. Bhadra·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2019
- Unwilling or Unable? Using 3D tracking to evaluate dogs' reactions to differing human intentions.
C. J. Voelter, L. Lonardo, … L. Huber·bioRxiv·Jul 9, 2022
- Dominance in dogs as rated by owners corresponds to ethologically valid markers of dominance
E. Kubinyi, L. Wallis·bioRxiv·May 9, 2019
- Development of a fixed list of descriptors for the qualitative behavioural assessment of shelter dogs
L. Arena, F. Wemelsfelder, … S. Barnard·bioRxiv·Feb 8, 2019
- From wag to affect: Tail kinematic signatures of canine emotional states in computer-controlled environments
Yuri Ouchi, Cara Glynn, … Tiago Monteiro·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2026
- Automated Facial Landmark Analysis vs. Manual Coding: Accuracy in Dog Emotional Expression Classification
Jiao-Ling Appels, George Martvel, … Stefanie Riemer·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2025