Detection, communication, and individual identification with deep audio embeddings: A case study with North Atlantic right whales
Irina TolkovaiD, Holger KlinckiD, Dana A. CusanoiD, Anke KügleriD, Susan E. ParksiD
Abstract
Anthropogenic noise has increased ambient sound levels across the globe, both underwater and on land. Among its many negative impacts, heightened noise can impair communication in vocal animals through acoustic masking. Conceptually, noise reduces the animals communication space - the area in which an individual animal can effectively convey information to a conspecific listener. Previous studies have estimated the communication space using sound propagation models and/or behavioral studies. However, studies frequently equate signal recognition with signal detection - a necessary but not sufficient precondition - thereby persistently overestimating spatial coverage and underestimating anthropogenic impacts. Measuring communication is inherently difficult, and varies with taxa, call type, and context, leading to significant data gaps in key parameters. We propose that deep learning creates an opportunity to estimate biologically-relevant communication, even for data-limited species. In particular, we present a case study with the critically endangered North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis; hereafter NARW). Prior research has demonstrated that the upcall - a low-frequency contact call produced across ages and sexes - encodes individual identity. We therefore consider a dataset of NARW vocalizations recorded with on-animal archival tags, spanning 234 samples across 11 individuals from 3 sites. First, we demonstrate that audio embeddings from the BirdNET model can robustly distinguish individual right whales. Then, we simulate the effect of varying ambient noise levels to estimate signal excess for both signal detection and individual identification. Altogether, we hope this work provides both a methodological advance for individual identification and a framework for better understanding anthropogenic impacts on vocal wildlife.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 0th percentile
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Avoidance, confusion or solitude? Modelling how noise pollution affects whale migration
S. T. Johnston, K. J. Painter·bioRxiv·Sep 27, 2023
- Caller identification and characterization of individual humpback whale acoustic behavior
J. M. Zeh, V. Perez-Marrufo, … S. E. Parks·bioRxiv·Oct 17, 2023
- WhaleSonic: Recordings of cetacean vocal behaviour with hydrophone arrays in Northern Norway
Joerg Rychen, A. Berg, … R. Hahnloser·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2026
- Whales in Space: Experiencing Aquatic Animals in Their Natural Place with the Hydroambiphone
James P. Crutchfield, David D. Dunn, Alexandra M. Jurgens·bioRxiv·Dec 27, 2023
- Long distance calls: negligible information loss of seabird social vocalisations over propagation down to the hearing threshold
Anna Natalia Osiecka, Przemysław Bryndza, … Katarzyna Wojczulanis‐Jakubas·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 2, 2024
- BirdAVES in the wild: individual recognition as a step toward zebra finch communication networks
Aneesh Chauhan, Hugo Loning, … Bhavya Botta·bioRxiv·Nov 20, 2025