Dynamic dot displays reveal material motion network in the human brain
Abstract
There is growing research interest in the neural mechanisms underlying the recognition of material categories and properties. This research field, however, is relatively more recent and limited compared to investigations of the neural mechanisms underlying object and scene category recognition. Motion is particularly important for the perception of non-rigid materials, but the neural basis of non-rigid material motion remains unexplored. Using fMRI, we investigated which brain regions respond preferentially to material motion versus other types of motion. We introduce a new database of stimuli - dynamic dot materials - that are animations of moving dots that induce vivid percepts of various materials in motion, e.g. flapping cloth, liquid waves, wobbling jelly. Control stimuli were scrambled versions of these same animations and rigid three-dimensional rotating dots. Results showed that isolating material motion properties with dynamic dots (in contrast with other kinds of motion) activates a network of cortical regions in both ventral and dorsal visual pathways, including areas normally associated with the processing of surface properties and shape, and extending to somatosensory and premotor cortices. We suggest that such a widespread preference for material motion is due to strong associations between stimulus properties. For example viewing dots moving in a specific pattern not only elicits percepts of material motion; one perceives a flexible, non-rigid shape, identifies the object as a cloth flapping in the wind, infers the objects weight under gravity, and anticipates how it would feel to reach out and touch the material. These results are a first important step in mapping out the cortical architecture and dynamics in material-related motion processing.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 0.40
- Field percentile
- top 41%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Disentangling object category representations driven by dynamic and static visual input
Sophia Robert, Leslie G. Ungerleider, Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 6, 2022
- Moving and static faces, bodies, objects and scenes are differentially represented across the three visual pathways
Emel Küçük, Matthew J Foxwell, … David Pitcher·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2024
- Perceiving Material Qualities from Moving Contours
Amna Malik, Ying Yu, … Katja Doerschner·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Apr 14, 2026
- The role of agentive and physical forces in the neural representation of motion events
Seda Akbıyık, Oliver Sussman, … Alfonso Caramazza·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 27, 2023
- A quantitative framework for motion visibility in human cortex
Daniel Birman, Justin L. Gardner·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 11, 2018
- Depth-resolved ultra-high field fMRI reveals feedback contributions to surface motion perception
Ingo Marquardt, Peter De Weerd, … Kâmil Uludaǧ·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jun 4, 2020