bioRxivMicrobiology
Systematic analysis of REBASE identifies numerous Type I restriction-modification systems that contain duplicated, variable hsdS specificity genes that randomly switch methyltransferase specificity by recombination.
J. M. Atack, C. Guo, T. Litfin, L. Yang, P. J. Blackall, Y. Zhou, M. P. Jennings
Abstract
N6-adenine DNA methyltransferases associated with some Type I and Type III restriction-modification (R-M) systems are able to randomly switch expression by variation in the length of locus-encoded simple sequence repeats (SSRs). SSR tract-length variation causes ON/OFF switching of methyltransferase expression, resulting in genome-wide methylation differences, and global changes in gene expression. These epigenetic regulatory systems are called phasevarions, phase-variable regulons, and are widespread in bacteria. A distinct switching system has also been described in Type I R-M systems, based on recombination-driven changes in hsdS genes, which dictate the DNA target site. In order to determine the prevalence of recombination-driven phasevarions, we generated a program called RecombinationRepeatSearch to interrogate REBASE and identify the presence and number of inverted repeats of hsdS downstream of Type I R-M loci. We report that 5.9% of Type I R-M systems have duplicated variable hsdS genes containing inverted repeats capable of phase-variation. We report the presence of these systems in the major pathogens Enterococcus faecalis and Listeria monocytogenes, which will have important implications for pathogenesis and vaccine development. These data suggest that in addition to SSR-driven phasevarions, many bacteria have independently evolved phase-variable Type I R-M systems via recombination between multiple, variable hsdS genes. ImportanceMany bacterial species contain DNA methyltransferases that have random on/off switching of expression. These systems called phasevarions (phase-variable regulons) control the expression of multiple genes by global methylation changes. In every previously characterised phasevarion, genes involved in pathobiology, antibiotic resistance, and potential vaccine candidates are randomly varied in their expression, commensurate with methyltransferase switching. A systematic study to determine the extent of phasevarions controlled by invertible Type I R-M systems has never before been performed. Understanding how bacteria regulate genes is key to the study of physiology, virulence, and vaccine development; therefore it is critical to identify and characterize phase-variable methyltransferases controlling phasevarions.
- organism: bacteria (other)
- research focus: chromatin & epigenetic regulation
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Streptococcus suis encodes multiple allelic variants of a phase-variable Type III DNA methyltransferase, ModS, that control distinct phasevarions
G. Tram, F. E.- C. Jen, … J. M. Atack·bioRxiv·Jan 26, 2021
- The streptococcal phase-variable Type I Restriction-Modification system SsuCC20p dictates the methylome of Streptococcus suis and impacts virulence
T. Roodsant, B. C. van der Putten, … C. Schultsz·bioRxiv·Mar 17, 2023
- Diversification of the restriction modification system of Streptococcus pyogenes through its acquisition of mobile elements
A. Ota, Y. Nishiuchi, … F. MARUYAMA·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2020
- Natural recombination among Type I restriction-modification systems creates diverse genomic methylation patterns among Xylella fastidiosa strains
M. L. O'Leary, L. P. Burbank·bioRxiv·Sep 1, 2022
- The Patchy Distribution of Restriction-Modification System Genes and the Conservation of Orphan Methyltransferases in Halobacteria.
Matthew S. Fullmer, Matthew Ouellette, … Johann Peter Gogarten·GenesPeer-reviewed·Mar 19, 2019
- Methylation by multiple type I restriction modification systems avoids influencing gene regulation in uropathogenic Escherichia coli
K. S. Mehershahi, S. Chen·bioRxiv·Jan 8, 2021