Active vision in binocular depth estimation: a top-down perspective
Matteo PriorelliiD, Giovanni PezzuloiD, Ivilin Peev StoianoviD
Abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWDepth estimation is an ill-posed problem: objects of different shapes or dimensions, even if at different distances, may project to the same image on the retina. Our brain uses several cues for depth estimation, including monocular cues such as motion parallax and binocular cues like diplopia. However, it is still unclear how the computations required for depth estimation are implemented in biologically plausible ways. State-of-the-art approaches to depth estimation based on deep neural networks implicitly describe the brain as a hierarchical feature detector. Instead, we propose an alternative approach that casts depth estimation as a problem of active inference. We show that depth can be inferred by inverting a hierarchical generative model that simultaneously predicts the eyes projections from a 2D belief over an object. Model inversion consists of a series of biologically plausible, homogeneous transformations based on Predictive Coding principles. Under the plausible assumption of a nonuniform fovea resolution, depth estimation favors an active vision strategy that fixates the object with the eyes, rendering the depth belief more accurate. This strategy is not realized by first fixating on a target and then estimating the depth, but by combining the two processes through action-perception cycles, with a similar mechanism of the saccades during object recognition. The proposed approach requires only local (top-down and bottom-up) message passing that can be implemented in biologically plausible neural circuits.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 0.82
- Field percentile
- top 30%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Optimal motion-in-depth estimation with natural stimuli
Daniel Herrera, Johannes Burge·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2024
- Mis-perception of motion in depth originates from an incomplete transformation of retinal signals
T. Scott Murdison, Guillaume Leclercq, … Gunnar Blohm·Journal of VisionPeer-reviewed·Oct 24, 2019
- Scene-relative object motion biases depth percepts
Ranran L French, Gregory C. DeAngelis·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 2, 2022
- Population codes for biological stereopsis extend beyond correlation-based binocular disparity computations
Bayu Gautama Wundari, Ichiro Fujita, Hiroshi Ban·bioRxiv·May 29, 2026
- Flexible computation of object motion and depth based on viewing geometry inferred from optic flow
Zhe-Xin Xu, Jiayi Pang, … Gregory C. DeAngelis·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Dec 30, 2025
- Human-like monocular depth biases in deep neural networks
Yuki Kubota, Taiki Fukiage·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 19, 2025