bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Understanding the impact of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda J. E. Smith) leaf damage on maize yields
Abstract
Fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda J. E. Smith), a serious pest of maize and other cereals, recently invaded the Old World potentially threatening the food security and incomes of millions of smallholder farmers. Being able to assess the impacts of a pest on yields is fundamental to developing Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approaches. Hence, working with an early maturing, medium maturing and late maturing variety, we inoculated maize plants with 2nd instar S. frugiperda larvae at V5, V8, V12, VT and R1 growth stages. Different plants were inoculated 1-3 times and larvae were removed after 1 or 2 weeks to generate a wide range of leaf damage profiles. We scored plants for leaf damage at 3, 5 and 7 weeks after emergence (WAE) using the Davis scale, and at harvest plant height, ear damage and grain yield per plant were recorded. We used Structural Equation Models to assess the direct effects of leaf damage on yield and indirect effects via plant height. For the early and medium maturing varieties leaf damage at 3 and 5 WAE, respectively, had significant negative linear effects on grain yield. In the late maturing variety, leaf damage at 7 WAE had an indirect effect on yield through a significant negative linear effect on plant height. However, despite the controlled screenhouse conditions, in all three varieties leaf damage explained less than 3% of the variation in yield at the plant level. Overall, these results indicate that S. frugiperda induced leaf damage has a slight but detectable impact on yield at a specific plant developmental stage, and our models will contribute to the development of decision-support tools for IPM. However, given the low average yields obtained by smallholders in sub-Saharan Africa and the relatively low levels of FAW induced leaf damage recorded in most areas, IPM strategies should focus on interventions aimed at improving plant vigour (e.g. through integrated soil fertility management) and the role of natural enemies, as these are likely to result in greater yield gains at lower cost than alternatives.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Laboratory and field trials reveal the potential of a gel formulation of entomopathogenic nematodes as biocontrol against the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda)
P. Fallet, D. Bazagwira, … T. C. J. Turlings·Biological ControlPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2022
- Pathogenicity of Purpureocillium lilacinum and Clonostachys rosea Against Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) Under Laboratory Conditions
Abel Jonathan Mussa, Maulid Walad Mwatawala, … Joseph Oswald Ruboha·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Mar 16, 2026
- Desmodium Volatiles in "Push-Pull" Cropping Systems and Protection Against the Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda
Daria M Odermatt, Frank Chidawanyika, … Meredith Christine Schuman·eLifePeer-reviewed·Oct 9, 2025
- Influence of plant defense signaling and innate insect metabolic differences to the overall performance of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) corn and rice strains on maize as a host
B. Israni, S. Haenniger, … D. G. Vassao·bioRxiv·Dec 7, 2023
- Control of fall armyworm with Spodoptera frugiperda multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus in sweet corn cultivated under agroecological conditions
Thomas Cunningham, C. de la Colina, … Ricardo Salvador·BioControlPeer-reviewed·Jun 22, 2026
- Forecasting the global extent of invasion of the cereal pest Spodoptera frugiperda, the fall armyworm
R. Early, P. Gonzalez-Moreno, … R. Day·bioRxiv·Aug 15, 2018