eLifeEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Desmodium Volatiles in "Push-Pull" Cropping Systems and Protection Against the Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda
Daria M OdermattiD, Frank ChidawanyikaiD, Daniel Munyao MutyambaiiD, Bernhard SchmidiD, Luiz A. Domeignoz‐HortaiD, Collins O OnjuraiD, Amanuel TamiruiD, Meredith Christine SchumaniD
Abstract
Push-pull systems for sustainable pest management combine repellent stimuli from intercrops ("push") and attractive stimuli from border plants ("pull") to repel herbivorous insects from a main crop and attract the herbivores natural enemies. The most widespread implementation, intercropping the legume Desmodium with maize surrounded by border grass, reduces damage from the invasive fall armyworm (FAW) Spodoptera frugiperda. However, the three publications to date investigating underlying mechanisms disagree about the role of the Desmodium intercrop and whether it emits volatiles that repel FAW. Here, we synthesize knowledge on the effects of maize-Desmodium push-pull on FAW, report volatiles from two commonly used Desmodium species: Desmodium intortum and D. incanum, and test whether these affect the behavior of gravid FAW moths in bioassays. We detected 25 volatiles from field-grown Desmodium, many in the headspaces of both species, including volatiles previously reported to repel lepidopteran herbivores. In cage oviposition assays, FAW moths preferred to oviposit on maize over Desmodium, but not on maize further from, versus closer to Desmodium plants that were inaccessible to the moths, but sharing the air. In flight tunnel assays, moths approached the headspace of maize more than the shared headspace of maize and Desmodium, but pairwise differences were often insignificant. Thus, headspaces of Desmodium species include volatiles that could repel FAW moths, and gravid moths were generally more attracted to maize and its headspace than to either Desmodium species or mixed maize-Desmodium headspaces. However, our results indicate that volatiles from Desmodium are not sufficient to explain reduced FAW infestation of maize under push-pull cultivation.
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Field percentile
- top 42%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The push-pull intercrop Desmodium does not repel, but intercepts and kills pests
A. L. Erdei, A. B. David, … T. Dekker·eLifePeer-reviewed·Mar 13, 2024
- Laboratory and field trials reveal the potential of a gel formulation of entomopathogenic nematodes as biocontrol against the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda)
P. Fallet, D. Bazagwira, … T. C. J. Turlings·Biological ControlPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2022
- Understanding the impact of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda J. E. Smith) leaf damage on maize yields
R. D. Harrison, C. Chisonga, … P. Sohati·bioRxiv·Dec 1, 2022
- Pathogenicity of Purpureocillium lilacinum and Clonostachys rosea Against Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) Under Laboratory Conditions
Abel Jonathan Mussa, Maulid Walad Mwatawala, … Joseph Oswald Ruboha·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Mar 16, 2026
- Influence of plant defense signaling and innate insect metabolic differences to the overall performance of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) corn and rice strains on maize as a host
B. Israni, S. Haenniger, … D. G. Vassao·bioRxiv·Dec 7, 2023
- First report of Telenomus remus parasitizing Spodoptera frugiperda and its natural parasitism in South China
Y.-L. Liao, B. Yang, … H.-Y. Chen·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2019