Annals of Human GeneticsGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
Ancestry-stratified variant classification in monogenic diabetes genes: annotation coverage and differential curation burden
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 21th percentile
Abstract
Variant databases ClinVar and gnomAD are the backbone of clinical variant interpretation, but their population composition is skewed toward European ancestry. Whether this skew creates systematic classification disadvantages for non-European patients with monogenic diabetes has not been examined at the database level. ClinVar variant_summary (GRCh38, April 2026; 4,421,188 variants) was cross-referenced with gnomAD v4.0 genome data for 17 monogenic diabetes genes. Annotation coverage and variant classification rates were computed stratified by genetic ancestry group (AFR, AMR, EAS, SAS, MID, NFE, FIN, ASJ). Of 14,691 gnomAD variants across the 17 genes, only 29.7% had any ClinVar classification (range: 12.7%-61.3% by gene). Among classified variants, non-Finnish European (NFE) variants had the highest variant of uncertain significance (VUS) rate (32.1%) and the lowest benign/likely benign fraction (41.6%), consistent with a large submission volume without functional follow-up. African-ancestry (AFR) variants showed the second-highest VUS rate (29.2%), not statistically distinguishable from NFE after Bonferroni correction, while all other non-European groups had significantly lower rates (all p < 0.001). GCK showed a pattern inversion -- non-European VUS rate (18.5%) exceeding European (15.0%) -- consistent with progressive reclassification in European populations absent in non-European cohorts. Annotation coverage and VUS divergence were uncorrelated (r = -0.15, p = 0.57). The primary equity problem is a 70% annotation gap combined with a non-European curation deficit, not a simple VUS excess. Ancestry-stratified evaluation of ClinGen Variant Curation Expert Panel (VCEP) criteria performance is warranted across disease domains.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-exome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- ClinVar and HGMD genomic variant classification accuracy has improved over time, as measured by implied disease burden
Andrew G. Sharo, Yangyun Zou, … Steven E. Brenner·Genome MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jul 13, 2023
- A systematic mapping of the genomic and proteomic variation associated with monogenic diabetes
Ksenia G. Kuznetsova, Jakub Vašíček, … Marc Vaudel·bioRxiv·Jan 19, 2023
- ClinGen CDH1 specifications for the ACMG/AMP guidelines: improvement of germline variant clinical assertions and updated curation guidelines
Xi Luo, Jamie L. Maciaszek, … Rachid Karam·medRxiv·Nov 1, 2021
- Functional interpretation, cataloging, and analysis of 1,341 known and new glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase variants
Renee C. Geck, Nicholas R. Powell, Maitreya J. Dunham·bioRxiv·Sep 14, 2022
- Identification of misclassified ClinVar variants using disease population prevalence
Naisha Shah, Ying-Chen Claire Hou, … Amalio Telenti·bioRxiv·Sep 15, 2016
- Middle Eastern Genetic Variation Improves Clinical Annotation of the Human Genome
Sathishkumar Ramaswamy, Ruchi Jain, … Ahmad N. Abou Tayoun·Journal of Personalized MedicinePeer-reviewed·Mar 9, 2022