Genome MedicineGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
ClinVar and HGMD genomic variant classification accuracy has improved over time, as measured by implied disease burden
Andrew G. SharoiD, Yangyun ZouiD, Aashish N. AdhikariiD, Steven E. BrenneriD
- Citations
- 52
- FWCI
- 8.61
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Abstract
Curated databases of genetic variants assist clinicians and researchers in interpreting genetic testing results. Yet these databases contain variants misclassified as pathogenic, which do not result in pathogenic phenotypes. Using archives of ClinVar and HGMD, we investigated how variant misclassification has changed over six years across different ancestry groups. We considered inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) screened in newborns as a model system because these disorders are often highly penetrant with neonatal phenotypes. We used samples from the 1000 Genomes Project (1KGP) to identify individuals with genotypes that were classified by the databases as pathogenic. Due to the rarity of IEMs, nearly all such classified pathogenic genotypes indicate likely variant misclassification in ClinVar or HGMD. While the false positive rate of both ClinVar and HGMD have improved over time, HGMD variants currently would imply two orders of magnitude more affected individuals in 1KGP than ClinVar variants. We observed that African ancestry individuals have a significantly increased chance of being incorrectly indicated to be affected by a screened IEM when HGMD variants are used. However, this bias affecting genomes of African ancestry was no longer significant once common variants were removed in accordance with recent variant interpretation guidelines. We discovered that ClinVar variants classified as Pathogenic or Likely Pathogenic are reclassified 11-fold more often than DM or DM? variants in HGMD, which has likely resulted in ClinVars lower false positive rate. Considering misclassified variants that have since been reclassified, we found that variant interpretation guidelines and allele frequency databases comprised of genetically diverse samples are important factors in reclassification. Finally, we find that ClinVar variants common in European and South Asian individuals were more likely to be reclassified to a lower confidence category, perhaps due to an increased chance of these variants being classified by multiple submitters.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Identification of misclassified ClinVar variants using disease population prevalence
Naisha Shah, Ying-Chen Claire Hou, … Amalio Telenti·bioRxiv·Sep 15, 2016
- Ancestry-stratified variant classification in monogenic diabetes genes: annotation coverage and differential curation burden
Paulo Dario·Annals of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 23, 2026
- Genome Alert!: a standardized procedure for genomic variant reinterpretation and automated genotype-phenotype reassessment in clinical routine
Kévin Yauy, François Lecoquierre, … Nicolas Philippe·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Mar 17, 2022
- Ancestry-specific performance of variant effect predictors in clinical variant classification
Rachel A. Hoffing, Daniel Zeiberg, … Predrag Radivojac A·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2026
- Towards Analyzing the Reclassification Dynamics of ClinVar Variants
Andreas Ruscheinski, Anna Lena Reimler, … Adelinde M. Uhrmacher·bioRxiv·Jan 24, 2023
- Response to Shah et al: Using high-resolution variant frequencies empowers clinical genome interpretation and enables investigation of genetic architecture
Nicola Whiffin, Angharad M. Roberts, … James S. Ware·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2019