bioRxivBioinformaticsPreprint
Assessing the accuracy of Approximate Bayesian Computation approaches to infer epidemiological parameters from phylogenies
Abstract
Phylodynamics typically rely on likelihood-based methods to infer epidemiological parameters from dated phylogenies. These methods are essentially based on simple epidemiological models because of the difficulty in expressing the likelihood function analytically. Computing this function numerically raises additional challenges, especially for large phylogenies. Here, we use Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) to circumvent these problems. ABC is a likelihood-free method of parameter inference, based on simulation and comparison between target data and simulated data, using summary statistics. We simulated target trees under several epidemiological scenarios in order to assess the accuracy of ABC methods for inferring epidemiological parameter such as the basic reproduction number (R0), the mean duration of infection, and the effective host population size. We designed many summary statistics to capture the information in a phylogeny and its corresponding lineage-through-time plot. We then used the simplest ABC method, called rejection, and its modern derivative complemented with adjustment of the posterior distribution by regression. The availability of machine learning techniques including variable selection, motivated us to compute many summary statistics on the phylogeny. We found that ABC-based inference reaches an accuracy comparable to that of likelihood-based methods for birth-death models and can even outperform existing methods for more refined models and large trees. By re-analysing data from the early stages of the recent Ebola epidemic in Sierra Leone, we also found that ABC provides more realistic estimates than the likelihood-based methods, for some parameters. This work shows that the combination of ABC-based inference using many summary statistics and sophisticated machine learning methods able to perform variable selection is a promising approach to analyse large phylogenies and non-trivial models.
- assay: DNA methylation
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: phylogenetics / evolution
- approach: statistical model
- approach: Bayesian inference
- approach: machine learning (classical)
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Simulation-based inference of epidemiological and phylodynamic models via Neural Posterior Estimation
Francesco Pinotti, Julien Thézé, … Guillaume Fournié·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Aug 26, 2026
- Using phylogenetic summary statistics for epidemiological inference
Rafael C. Núñez, Gregory R. Hart, … Joshua T. Herbeck·bioRxiv·Aug 7, 2024
- Bayesian phylodynamic inference with complex models
Erik Volz, Igor A. Siveroni·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 13, 2018
- Deep learning from phylogenies to uncover the epidemiological dynamics of outbreaks
Jakub Voznica, Anna Zhukova, … Olivier Gascuel·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 6, 2022
- Resolving outbreak dynamics using Approximate Bayesian Computation for stochastic birth-death models
Jarno Lintusaari, Paul Blomstedt, … Jukka Corander·Wellcome Open ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2019
- A computationally tractable birth-death model that combines phylogenetic and epidemiological data
Alexander E. Zarebski, Louis du Plessis, … Oliver G. Pybus·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 11, 2022